Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHO'S TO BLAME?

LOCAL RUGBY UNION ACCUSED OF DISCOURTESY. An article in the Christchurch "Sun" of Saturday alleges a great want of courtesy on. the part,of the Wellington Rugby Union in regard to a proposal for aii inter-provincial match. The "Sun" states that the proposal was, made entirely with the idea of Helping the Wellington Union in its efforts to retarfi Athletic Park, and proceeds as follows:— "On the 12th of this month the secretary to the Canterbury Rugby Union sent the following telegram to the secretary of the Wellington Union:—'My union, provided our competition ends Saturday, prepared to meet representative Wellington team here Saturday weefr, net proceeds for Wellington Union ground fund. Reply to-day giving your executive's opinion.' "That telegram was not answered. On September 17 an urgent telegram was sent to Wellington, asking: 'Can your representatives play here Saturday?' Still no reply was received. So, on the following day, a telegram was eent in these terms: -"Kindly reply agreeable or otherwise to telegrams of 12Eh and 17th instaut ra match.' "At last a reply was received from Wellington. It was but a curt telegram, as follows:—'Sorry we liave no vacant date.' Nothing more, has been received from Wellington—not even a word of thanks for tho Canterbury Union's offer." Mr. D. D.-AVeir, chairman of the Management Committee of the AYellington Union, on being questioned' on the matter, said that, so far \as the AVellington Committee is aware, only one telegram was received from Canterbury, and that was replied to on tho day it was received. •If any other telegram had been received the committee, as a committee, was not aware of it. Ho regretted very much that any apparent discourtesy should have been shown to the Canterbury Union, whose offer was much appreciated. Full inquiries would be made at the weekly meeting of tho commi.ttee to-night, and an explanation forwarded to Canterbury.

Walter P. Bichardson. the leading man of J. and N. Tait's "Turn to the Eight" Cdmpany, has been accommodated ivith a-fine now part in J. and N. Tait's latest success, "The New Henrietta." Hitherto, Mr. Richardson has only been seen in the .youthful role of Joe Bascom in "Turn to. the EicM," but as Van Aletyne in "The New Henrietta" Australian audiences will behold the youne actor ae a successful mining magnate who, having acquired riches by hard word, appreciates the nower to relax from his. attitude of self-denial in his later middle age"; It is a RTeat part for an actor who understands the type.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170925.2.64

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3199, 25 September 1917, Page 7

Word Count
419

WHO'S TO BLAME? Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3199, 25 September 1917, Page 7

WHO'S TO BLAME? Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3199, 25 September 1917, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert