Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WAR BONUSES

A '"..-..; —... . <> .;, ' •- •■ • FOR WELL-PAID , OFFICIALS; /Atthe monthly meeting of theWek lington,- Hospital Board, held yesterday,- the Rev. H. Van Staveren moved: "That no war bonus be paid to any officers of the board who.are in. feceipt of : £300, per.,annum or,more.". \ _ In speaking, to the. motion, Mr. Van' Staveren ;said.that they, were all making V sacrifices at the present time, and he did' not think that those getting ■higlusalaries .should., bonuses, particularly those who were already, getting.free coal<*ndlighting. '-. . ;Mr. D. .Campbell seconded .the., motion. , .■'.'■;'.'' ;. ... .The Rev. Dr. Elliott said.he couldnet aaxee with, the motion. It appeared .to him that .'many we're only inclined to. favour, the. one.class —the poor—whereas justice should be done to ; all classes, rich and poor.' He had fottnd throughout a long life that 'the wore money he had the nwre_ his expenditure,' and responsibilities ' in- ■ creased. : I The .chairman said that, the position i was that the* arrangement affected j three persons, and would involve the I board in the expenditure of £46 16s. '. per annum.. ■'..'. . ..' .. ■ V j It was pointed "but that the matter ! was-thrashed out in committee, _ and ■ the resolution passed by the committee ", and confirmed was that the. non-resi- .' dent-members of the-staff we«> given • a war- bonus of 6s. per week irrespeo ; tire "of the positions held. \ _ i '• The -chairman thought that in ..view, | of the'..resolution; oh the minute's, it ; would be necessary to rescind it he- : fore they could "accept the motion, jn-> 'i asmuoh.as.it:restricted the operation : of .the-motion. ': \ .'•■■■'■■ '• Mr! .F. Castle agreed,-and-heldthati ; the. motion was out of order. I The chairman ruled that the motion ; was-out of order. The Rev. Mr./ Van ; Staveren made a .warm protest against - the action- of the chairman, but the ' protest fell oh deaf ears!

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19170420.2.102

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3058, 20 April 1917, Page 12

Word Count
289

WAR BONUSES Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3058, 20 April 1917, Page 12

WAR BONUSES Dominion, Volume 10, Issue 3058, 20 April 1917, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert