Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COAL VEND CASE.

■ COLLIEBY OWNERS UNLIKELY TO , APPEAL. py Teleera-ph—Press Association—Copyrteht ■ (R-ec. Juno 28, 0.20 a.m.) - Melbourne, Juno 27. During the censure debate in the Federal House, Mr.: W. M. Hughes, AttorneyGeneral, hinted at the probability of some of the 'defendants in tho Coal Vend case not joining in the proposed appeal. Inquiry in well-informed circles indicates that Mr. Hughes J s belief is well- ' founded, and that it is probable that the colliery owners will not bo represented in the appeal.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19120628.2.48

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1473, 28 June 1912, Page 7

Word Count
82

COAL VEND CASE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1473, 28 June 1912, Page 7

COAL VEND CASE. Dominion, Volume 5, Issue 1473, 28 June 1912, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert