"FAKING" OF SHOW SHEEP.
J A CRT FROM AUSTRALIA. Up to ths present t.irao there has been -rorv little of'tho faking and trimming ...of show sheep allowed in Australia | a. writer-in the Sydney "Mail ). the > writer continues: "In America -*nd Eng- | land this trickery has become a'scandal. f - The result is that after every big fair I the columns of the papers which specially, ise .in tho industries of the soil teem S with correspondence concerning the mat- !• ter. In New Zealand, too, the practico ! of making she-ep appear what they are not is bubbling up to a fir.o pitch, and, before; very long, there will be._ serious trouble there to eradicate, the evil. This faking and trimming of, show sheep is liko a 'lot of other bad practices—once, it-guts a hold it is not an easy, matter, ~ -to;'weed it out. In America and Great r. Britain'it has become as solid as a vested I : interest, and those breeders who raise : sheep which require some assistance from i the expert trimmer, tenaciously 1 hold to • ! a. custom which -helps t'nem to compete ! ' against tho. breeders of animals that pDswss greater merit, and do not require to be faked to fetch good prices nt the fair." _ ; He goes on to deal with tho position | in .New. Zealand, and writes very strong- [ ly against "faking." Returning to the |; general question! Jio says:— | |f'- TESTS OF FAKERS' SKILL. ; "Basides the trimming and colouring [' of thn longwool breeds, there is a prac- ; tics of showing an animal with a growth r of 15 months' wool, and declaring at the i 'same time that it is a growth of only 12 :. months. It is not an easy matter to j detect this fraud. The. sheep may have ; been handled 12'.months before, and ; cither clipped or shorn long by an ex- • pert. 'The chief object is to leave such ' a quantity of wool 011 certain parts of the' i- sheep as "will appear to most people as i a' genuine year's, "growth. Tho resuit is 1 a growth that appears, to be tho very i acme of uniformity; When men are found ;. to admit, this, way ..of treating their sheep i tlicy justify theniselv«9 by saying, that, t ; others do it and why should not they? [ ' There is something in this contention. !;' Tho people primarily to blame arc the j; show committee for not .equipping the ! regulations with drastic clauses provid- > ing.for. the disqualification of tho guilty, i In .some of tho Australian show rings i this ovil'has'been noticed already, and • the committees have not taken a stand : against it. They ought to ceo the daiiger . of the ovil, which roots very deeply. It ; has been suggested that the societies could
Freven t, any such abuses if they instituted ' special-classes in which these sheep : would be shorn under the auspices of the • .society one year.-mul exhibited the fol- ;■ lowing year, special. earmarks being used
■ to prevent any substitution of'animals, j. This is a good suggestion. The trouble i is that, these faked exhibits' often, take
; the. eye of the judge more effectively : than tile sheep which havo been fairly j prepared, when, if' (hoy were honestly ! handled, they wnnld not by a match for | the animals which proved to ho unsuc- | ressfnl. Results of this sort often goad men on.to follow suit, and then thowholo : Imsiueis becomes a test of the skill of j tho . falters, with the sheep themselves i only as iv sort of tccandiU'V considcra- ; tion.
, MERINO BREEDERS EXAMPLE. Referring principally to Australia, tho ' "writer savs: "It is to tho credit of the ! -merino men that they have not. to any ; extent indulged in these nefarious practices. ... , The Sydney ami Melbourne j Associations have both set themselves f against, any illegal practices in these ! classes, and it is to be hoped that thev ; will not yield to the demands which the ; inkers may ho expccted to make if they j zee any chance of succeeding. One of ; the regulations for tho forthcoming show at Sydney provides that no exhibits shall : be oiled or dressed with anv foreign i matter, or be trimmed, except'for plucks ; and dags. So far as British breeds aro ; concerned, however, these conditions are I not enforced. It would appear that th.> | framers of the schedule were open to . give the trimmer in one section a chanc* which is denied in another. Unless there ; is a vigorous sland taken against the ; looseness there will be as much trouble ; necessary to eradicate it as has been ex- ;; pejienoed m other countries, and then ; toero is no certainty that it will be got • rid of. In all classes sheep should b« ; sh ®«'n as naturally as possible. J n En"land, the practice is at such a pitch now thai the colouring completely changes : the natural appearance of tho exhibit, ant as a result every person concerned is : fooled by the tnckery. The longer tho ;M'l °? to . o::i5l: f ! lc more difficult it i\ili be to make any headway against
; „i,T r ' 15 i I11;ln , 1 , 0 desires to make the cheapest pork, the bnest pr.rk, and nro- ; il.uco hogs that shall be in the best po.;- ! Bible state of health and vigour, must , include lucerne in his calculation." This ! " 'Be conclusion of the senior editor of : Hoards Dairyman," and wherever ; thoroughgoing tests have been made they '• 'have confirmed that conclusion. At the : Kansas, experiment station n test showed that a gam of 8001b. of pork whs made , from a ton of alfalfa hay, and about ; tho same amount from an area of alfalfa pasture. One hundred pounds of alfalfa hay in another experiment saved • OGIb. of corn. A.t that rate an acre of alfalfa, yielding four tons of hay, would pvoduco 10001b. of pork. Tho preliminary statistics of the West . Australian _whe.it harvest are much below the estimate. The area cut for grain was 580,508 acres, yielding 5,885,777 buslt- : els, an avorag'o of 10.lt bushels nor acre, shewing an increase of 131,050 acros. 283,150!! bushels, and a decreased average of ■ 2.3(1 bushels. The area cut for hay was j 134,501 acres, yielding 110,121 tons., show- ; ing increases of 32,911 acres and 11,172 : tons, whilo the yield was 1.1 tons per acre, a decrease of .2 tons per acre,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19110629.2.97
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1166, 29 June 1911, Page 10
Word Count
1,046"FAKING" OF SHOW SHEEP. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1166, 29 June 1911, Page 10
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.