Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PANAMA CANAL.

VOTE FOR FORTIFICATION,

/ Dy Telcf raph-Prcss ABSoclallon-Copyrlght New York, February 20. ■Dy an overwhelming majority, the, United States' House of Representatives voted in favour of fortifying tho Panama Cnnnl by passing a preliminary fortifications appropriation of thrco million dollars (.MOO.OOO).

■An amendment asking the President to sccuro neutrality of tho cannl by treaty between America and the world's lending maritime Powers was proposed, but defeated.

The Republican and Democratic parties were sharply divided on. the question, nnd there was much cross-voting. Some of the speakers asserted that tho United States' imperative duty was to fortify the canal. Tho Senate is certain to adopt the proposal. A' MUCH-DEBATED QUESTION. Therq is much difference of opinion in the United States as to the advisability of fortifying the Panama Canal. • Mr. Taft is recommending fortifications at both ontrances of the canal and at intermediate points, together with naval station?. Mr. Roosevelt is an ardent supporter of fortification, and in a speech in September last said:—

"Wβ are in honour bound to fortify it ourselves, and only by so doing can we effectively guarantee that it shall not bo used against us. The chief material advantage—certainly one of the chief material advantages—which wo shall gain by its construction is the way in which it will, . for defensive purposes, double the power of the United States Navy. To rofuso to fortify it, and, abovo all, to consider for a moment such nn act .of utter weakness and folly as to invite other nations to step in and guarantee the neutrality of this purely American work (and thoroby really to niako it certain that in tho event of war wo should find tho canal used against us, as our fleets would be forbidden to pass through it, dr. else our opponents' fleets permitted to), would be to incur, and quito rightfully, tho contempt of Iho world; it would mean the complete abandonment of the Monroe Dootrinoj'it would be a wicked blow to our prestige on tho Pacific; and, moreover, it would be in its essence treason to the destiny of the republic."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19110228.2.39

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1063, 28 February 1911, Page 5

Word Count
348

PANAMA CANAL. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1063, 28 February 1911, Page 5

PANAMA CANAL. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1063, 28 February 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert