Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

(Before Mr. W/< G. >Riddell, S:M.) - CIVIL.BUSINESS. WIFE SUES HUSBAND. •'.* "Margaret'Aekins, married woman; sued •Bbbeirt'James Aekins," clerk .in the- Kan- . .way. Department, Wellington, to recover tho sum -of.' XB' balance 'alleged 'to bo owing, for maintenance; - Hr._bamucK appeared for tho plaintiff: A. Gray tor the defendant.'- ' . ' . '• ~ .' The', parties were husband and wile, in - ■ iiift aoart;' Undor 'a deed iof separation .-•> drawn up 'in: October, 1899,-; defendant agreed'; to. pay, 'for the 'maintenance ot ' ' his "wife" ana four children,, the sum of Jtt ,'a'v.week ..for itho first year, and, ' thereafter;: tho > sum .of J!2 10s. a week. 1 Plaintiff .'had nover received - moro thnn jCS a week,'-and had nover asked for-more, until 'August-last, - when, on 'defendant .intimating that ho "only' to pay XI 10s.'* a week, 6he ,insisted on,tlio full ■ ! sum of' £2' 10s. V- week, - and -had -taken ■ 6feps ,to sue defendant. 'The latter ;ho . Binco paid >£2 • a week "up -.till January. ■ ahd the pre^nt'action was for the. balance .(lOs.'ia'weck) from. September 1« For/'the defehoe,it . was -: contended that plaintiff, by accepting -?2,a week for '.. eqveral years," had waived-her claim , to tho full amount,"and it was .further ;.contended .th'at ? sho-could, not succeed as,the receipts given by, her ".solicitors snowed '- that the'amount'of per week'had been paid in • full .satisfaction. . ?•: ■The magistrate ;considered- that ..the.case was one to bo decided,on'the equity; and ; p6od conscience rnle, v 'and'.gave judg- ■' meat defendant without costs.; , UNDEFENDED CASES. V . Judgment by default wasgiven • for ' * plaintiffs in ' tho fpllbwingj, undefended • cases*.—\ ± ■■■. ■■ James O'Dca y. Daniel-Lynch, .£6, costs " 'jEI 35." 6d;; John lligg and Co. y. L Milwn, 16s.'. Id., y costs 105..,- • Commercial Agency,. Ltd., assignee, ;andr Wairarapa Farmers' Co-operativo Association, i Ltd., v..Mrs. Annie Edwards,' -£2 Gs. llu. costs ■' 10s.; Ridley and .Co., Ltd.- v., John -Dal- - • cell,' :6d., costs 175.;: H: W.:Davies . - and Co.'- v. .J.. C.".'Vincent,.-.J819,'. costs 'XI :10s.. 6d.Charies Geo: <■ Bowker v.* Edward . Thomas ■ Yui1e,....J826,,55., costs .£2'.'l4s.; Tanner Bros., Ltd, v.'M. Prendergast, X 2 2s; fld.,- costs- lis.; Atlas; Biscuit • and Con- ... fectibn&ry Co. v.:Kach'el Peattie wC9 17s. Id.,- costs''Xl'.3s.' 6d.'; "Axel' Holtz' v. A. ■i Ji'. Hafsall,, XB. 3s.', costs.,Xl'.'3s. ,Gd.; V;Gordon' .Ltd; -v."T. :: Bernasconi'j6ll'ls.r2d.,' l costs' , :Xllos. 6d.; " ■ Queensland. Insurance .Co;, 'Ltd.-.v'.- W: C. ' Eowan, X 3 Bs. ,fld.- costs 10s. ; Pajmer Engineering Co., %v., D.. Coughlan XI ' Cs- '.costs'ss.'; same .v. J.. Orbell,'Xl 3s. ■' -JOd.,-costs ss. i - . , • : ' JUDGMENT.''SUMMONSES. • 1 'No • orders, were' made;in 'the > judgment ■ summons ' cases, Elisabeth r.ChapmHU* .v. Thomas ;a> claim, for Xd 18s. ■ spd Ann • Mary • Stovenson v. William Lap'worth, ai'claim;for '.Xl6>lls. 6d.... : ' ; POLICE .CASES. ' iDavid ,Wilson, ■ a- cook by occupation, was- charged with- theft'(on June 6, 1910) 'of.& rillc,-valued at X3vlss. tho property of. tho,- Zealand Government. . On tho of; Chiof.-Detective Broberg,; accused was .remnpded- until -Mon- •' day next, bail being allowed-in the sum c..; of XS and ono.surety of,Xs.' 'For .using; bad language, George .John Conroywas fined X 3, in- default 14' days' imprisonment! On'a charge of drunkenness' the same accuscd; was convicted and discharged,' and' an- order was .made for a,prohibition'order.'to'issue against him for'one-year.: ' .. . . ; ' , (George Alexander Dixon,' a seaman oil'-the, steamer Sussex, and-another sea- . man (a) first offender); who ■ had been remanded on charges of drunkenness, were copvicted,-and ordered to bo handed over last night -to tho custody of the . owners of the Sussex.' A first-offending'inebriate, who'did not-appeaT, .was ordered to.forfeit his .bail of 10s.,'or undergo 24 hours' imprisonment;; ,VV . • Throe other first. offenders • were ; fined 55., with-.the .alternative of 24 hours' iijiprisonment, and another,was convicted no' dischairged. '' - .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19110224.2.12

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1060, 24 February 1911, Page 3

Word Count
576

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1060, 24 February 1911, Page 3

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1060, 24 February 1911, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert