Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COW AND MACHINE.

" IMPORTANT MILKING ESPEFJ- • SIKKTS.- - Every dairying country in the world will bo interested in the experiments cecontly made in Denmark by N. 0. Hof-uian-Bang, of Copenhagen,, in -hand and Jimchiiifc milking during,•thosea&'fis 1907-8 and 191)8-9. Four uniform lots of 10 cows and 4 heifers each were in.the first, season's experiments, 'when' two of ,tho lota, wero tpilk'ed by machine and two by jgqd during an experimental, period of about • 3} months. Une of,the hand-milked lots .was stripped , by. hand after having been ma'cliine-milked; while this was not with the other lot. until after' forty-two days from the. beginning -of.tho .pepod when .it ;was deemed, necessary to. do' £0 on account of thprtlecrqa'so iflvtho milk .yield..CL.the-cbws.V'lrivthV-second season's i'lofs! ijfr fcr(ii'teen head each were t,\Vo*v ( of aged cows and, tiro of heifersj-one df -eaeh of these was milked by hand and the. other by. machine. : ,

. .The results of-the experiments showed -.that"nearly-, the same .amounts.of milk were,; in general, - obtained by either .Method of . milking; \EJoi--.the; aged cows, however,Shand .milking appeared..to give milkmjr', l-wnile.lhcvopposiM >was^ : tru^fc>r - tl}e heifveTs;'"°Thev"chemic:n' iomSositiori' of the niilk. not. affected. by the. Method- of niilkjiig adopted. No-special difficulties were, met .with in onerating- the machine, and .the cows stood quietly during .the process .of. milking.. .The - great-, difference in tho .ease of?milking, cows,-and ;heifers by, hand .was founds to. bo not .Tiearly.'so ■jirohoilnced.b'y'.iiiafchiho Bulking.' 5 .'•-»> - T.b'e results obtained indicate that one man-.with\ two..machines (milking- foul' cows") can do about the same 'work'as three.-hand-milkers, and can milk 50 to. 60 cows in 2 to 21 hours. The bacteriological examinations- Gf- Iho milk v drawii .by the raachinb':and bv hand showed' that' ma-chine-drawn' milk may have a. lower ■ bac.terial. content, than' that- of, milk. drawn by hijjid if-both the machine and tho teats; of .the cows are .kept ■ Scrupulously clean..,,' Care ."in keeping the. tents clean is especially important, from tho fact that bacteria in dirt adhering.to the teats .aro likely to be sucked; into tho milk pail with the. air and will tend largely.to increase the bactcrial content of the milk.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19110106.2.95.6

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1018, 6 January 1911, Page 8

Word Count
344

COW AND MACHINE. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1018, 6 January 1911, Page 8

COW AND MACHINE. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1018, 6 January 1911, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert