OHARIU SCHOOL.
Sir,H-With your' 'permission I. feel justified.;in saying a few words'>'re' the abbve. At . the last meeting .v; of! the Education Board,-» Mr. Lee i": (chairman), stated that a deputation had-;,come to the last board meeting and' produced (i . rotten stump in support of its contention that the piles wero rotten. Tli'ajt was no argument according to Mr". Lee. His own" house, '18 years old; had recently/been Tepaired; and ono of the pilps'-had been discovered to'bo rotten. rest; of tho building was- absolutely sound. . ;Mr. Editor, -as, .the opinion, is gaining ground that.my;com-.' mittee had. no reason to ask for a new; school, I .would like to say a few words to-substantiato what I have already said to! the Education Board. In the first placc I headed a deputation to the board, and asked for a new . school. •Mr. Leo informed the deputation that the question of a new school for Ohariu was then on tho order paper, and- would receive every consideration, as tho board, recognised that a new school .was 'accessary.-' Immediately tho deputationwithdrew, the question of a new school dropped/ and the, board thought of re-, pairing tho old one, as the board -wa-s shop of funds.' Yet it; appeared in tho jfess that Mr. . Lee stated at that meeting; that the board, was in a better, •financial position than it'had been for some time. At tho next meeting of the board I again put in an appearance, to show reason's why the school should, xot'be repaired. I took in proof thatrtte school wis over 35 years old (which nad' been repudiated by officials"of tho -board),.;.namely, entry in the log-book iby.Mr. Lee, Inspector of Schools; also ia'sample of tho piles, which Mr. Lee psays''rs"a'- rotten stump. Mr. Editor ■this- remark by Mr. Lee was totally ■uncalled for and unfair, as I took those '■ pieces of wood from under the north side of the school ,in tho presence of i-'the head, teacher, arid there, was in that bag that I produced at tho meeting -of the board what--wis- left; of tWee, joiles- and piecc.s of - five, more. I have in my possession an entry made TjyiMr.. Loo in -the log-book 33, years ago,, that the'school was badly.built in theffirst place. Sftv Leo also stated that the board should accept the verdict" of their own ■officers in preference to that of outsiders." To show you, Mr".'Editor,"that outsiders, as Mr, Lee calls us, know something about it, the' board have' JSjoatk; enlarged on-the first specifications that were drawn up by the board's • officials. In conclusion, Mr. Editor, "I 'may, state that I offered to pay the board's expenses to Ohariu, but Mr. Lee objected. 'Mr. Lee knew too well the condition of the. school. As a protest against this work being carried out, tho! committee has tendered its resignation.1 have the opinion of professional builders_ that it is a -waste of monev' to repair the old building, and as a builder myself am of the same opinion. •—l'am,-etc., - S. BRYANT. Ohariu, December 21, 1910.' .':
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19101224.2.144.3
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1008, 24 December 1910, Page 17
Word Count
505OHARIU SCHOOL. Dominion, Volume 4, Issue 1008, 24 December 1910, Page 17
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.