Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

Cross-bookkeeping,, as disclosed in the methods of the I'dlico and Justice Departments/ was : referred to in the Magistrate's Court yesterday... A man hhd been fined £2, and ordered to pay £3 for the repair of certain damago which ho was alleged to have done to a liouss. Application for costs was made by tho police, it being'explained that the fine was paid to tho crodit of tho Justice Department, and, unless costs of tho hearing, were allowed in addition, theso espouses have to be met by the Polico Department. The magistrate said that, in. looking at tho case, ho had decided that, for the offence proved, the man should be required to pay about £5, and costs would not bo allowed as well. If the Polico Denartmont accounts were , not. to suffer, under the present arrangements, it would bo necessary for him to ascertain tho amount of the costs in a case before giving a decision thereto.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100402.2.79

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 781, 2 April 1910, Page 8

Word Count
157

Untitled Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 781, 2 April 1910, Page 8

Untitled Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 781, 2 April 1910, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert