Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

COLLIERY DISPUTE.

NEWCASTLE MINERS. RESUMPTION ON MONDAY LIKELY. By Teloßrapii'rPreßa ABBooiatlbn—Copjrlshs. (Rec. February 14, 0:30 p.m.) - . Sydney,-February. 14. . :i , Judge '■ Scholes, i president.;! of tho,; Now South ■Wales: Wage's Boar.d, ; aftery confer;ririg .Iwith -tiib : Newcastle ;pwners . aßnonnced'-that-both; sides had : agreed. to his; proposal for/resumption of, work. ;,He sees notking.to-pr'ovent a resumption of 1 work on Monday next. TEEMS NOT DISCLOSED. 'i iy, ;■ (Rec.' February 14, .11 p.m;). ' Sydney, February 14 -' .Judge Scholes will not disclose the terms of settlement until tho Wages Hoard meets on Wednesday.' ;.'/ ■ PROGRESS REPORT OF BALLOT. A SLIGHT LEAD FOR PEACE . ... (Rec. February 15, 1.5 a.m.) Sydney, February 14. iYo'ting is proceeding'' at : •; Newcastle on. the question of accepting the • Wages. Board; : : h At present tho number for acccptanco and :the :nnmber , against arovery close,' thoaffirmative :.voting-':being . slightly .The ballot of- three largo lodges is yet •to -come.' f r >'X. f-'v'--MEN AT WORK IN THE SOUTH Sydney, February 14 v In accordance with the:result 'of.. t>.. ballot, all, the' Southern minors are working iib exMption'j.of Coledale, Bulli, ; South' /Clifton, MetropoUtan; .' : :; Thi : . : : last-named''is . only, delayed through a; mishap to tho. machinery. . ■■ BAILWAYMEN'S SYMPATHY. ■ (By Telegraph.—Press. Association.) , : Tlie- following ' resolution ;haa,been; -passed by. the- biennial-',conference; of -the Amalgamated -. Society;;; of; ./Railway .Servants of-,New Zealand,;v;no'W!. sitting, in. 'Wellington (.conference expresses -its'; indignation, at ~the/severity. - ,of the leaders'fof^the. 'Newcastle tokeVahd aS-'sbme evidence'of. sympathy -:'with 1 the header's ;bf; the Newcastlestrike subscriptionlists'; be : circu'-; ,;lated vthTOUghb'ut , v':tne;V',rociety;;; inviting contributions': to/assist'. the' ininSrs -. in.: the struggle for their - rights." . . I''':''' 4 "" : J; ■'THE WAGES iBOARD SYSTEM ; IS STRENGTHENED. : Writing .-on< .February s9, the, "Sydney Morning.;-Heraldrv^l'says:—"The wages; board'system ! willful timately' bs .'accepted; by - the Northern; miners, and '-the 'strike,-instead;"of,-breaking - itMo^rni'f.'.villf-'haTe. helped to" ,establish '.it 'Xi.TOis;- must /bring, nbthingtaty.gqbdVfor/ Newcastle.": But; what- seems.also /certain .is', that the strike' has introduced an element of discord between : the; three- -mining districts. ;;- : Th'e ■Southern.'!miners* are naturally/s6r'e.! A and :disgusted;'with- the action of the .Western: *, delegate,,in - voting ;on; Monday;, against;;a jet'urn .toiworfc: although hi' own com-: rades are.in,full. swing. .But.the feeling in tho soutli against the north is "also , full- of bitterness.':;;; The .hM proved' it; cpmplete':;disap^intmeht. ;: :.-'lfc.'has' 'Sot' ; helpe.dr Newcastle at all,'and< it'j has; 6eri: b'isly.' impoverished;, and 'hampered;'llia-■ warra,. ■* The;; Southern - miners ,'went out 'to. show., their ,; sympathy l , "with "the ..north,' and not to settle .any grievances' of their, own, viand they ft are'.- likely - to ■: return '• to work- without obtainihg-'even; the -'satis-' faction, .of.-knowing «that ; -somebody ontheir'side/ihas 2 won'a .battle. : .It ; is clear .chat;',; whatever ;?mav,; be;: done : 'at;-Ne^ castle; the south mil. be wise. to .return to work,... for ~ no,'good .'purpose', can; be ; s ,?''ved■. bydelay,'ian'd;every, .Tyeek■'• of■■adifbundations... of ".-■unionism - "itself;"■'

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100215.2.19

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 742, 15 February 1910, Page 5

Word Count
439

COLLIERY DISPUTE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 742, 15 February 1910, Page 5

COLLIERY DISPUTE. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 742, 15 February 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert