LAW REPORTS.

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 740, 12 February 1910, Page 14

LAW REPORTS.

SUPREME COURT. : CIVIL AND: DIVORCE CASES. THE LIST. . : ThVcivil'sittings of the Supreme Court were.to;have; beeii .commencedvon lionday; but-.as Mr; Justice:' Chapman has gone to Palmerston \North to .take • the circuit sitting . there, - .the .-civil.; business ill Wellington will have to be. adjourned. '.' In the following cases, the petitions are ,for-., dissolution of marriage., • • . John Cookson/. Phillips: v. - Elizabeth Maud'.yPliillips '.'and; George - Fletcher. ■ William. John Alexander M'Ginnity v. - Alico Louisa H'Ginuity and Frank Smith: ~ John Henry • Crawford v.. Florence Lily Crawford. Alfred Edgar Thomson v. Mary Thomson. .- ■ .--Maria Mary Shepherd ,Y. Samuel Laming Shepherd The,, case of Nettie< Lena. Mewhinney v. Oliver -Mewhinney, • an. application. .for ijudjcial separation,'. h4S"beenr>held over from the last sittings of tho Court. a The .-following civil cases have been set dovyn'- for hearing:— 1:

- Wellington Hospital;S.Gontnbn{ors v.: Ft ai i c'i'' Pfirl an (1 anAf Oswald' claim . due Minder a legacy" Ellen Lang Tucker Waddilove and William Wardrop Waddilove v; . the Wellington-. Harbour Ferries, Ltd., claim : .for -£1500 damage -for loss of life through negligence (Duco case). . : :;Elizabeth. Jane-M i onard'iv.. the-,WeJling- J ; 'ion : Harbour .. Terries, -Ltd., claim i. for • for loss of life through negligence (Duco case) s " *:-The"Wellington "Harbour Ferries,;: Ltd.,. v. iko Australian Alliance-Assurance; Co., Ltd.,:claim fnr.se2So;due-nndw a-policytof insurance. , \ i The ■ WelUngton'.Harbour.. -Ferries, litd.,. v:'.- the -Commercial Go;,' l Ltd:, claim>for'- ( i£soo .due-:.under:-:a policy of insurance t < ' ■Tile -Wellington Harbour 'Peri.-ie.'-, Ltd., vk the Corporation of: the -Boyal, Exchange; Assurance;: claim .for-<£soo. due -under apolicy of'insurance.- v. The Wellington Harbour ■ Ferries,' - Ltd., v. the New-Zealand -Insurance- Co.,- Ltd;, claim' for .£SOO duo, under a policy. of >. in-■ surance - i * The -Wellington Harbour Ferries,, Ltd.; v. the United Insurance C 0.,. Ltd., clato for .£250 .due-under;a..policy. of insurance. - The Wellington -Harbour -Ferries, Ltd., v. thp Canton- Insurance C 0.,. Ltd., claim for due under :a -policy of insurance. . -1-- : : Magnus.Sanderson and Company,: Ltd.,. v. ilfatterson and . for. ■J24S' 9s;'- lid. on^--goods;-Bupphedi»? ■ 'Alfred -Norman v.-.-'the Welling- 1 ton. Steam Ferry Company,- Ltd.; claim for-.-JjlOO -and'.-interest,^as tdamages:-for breaches of warranty. ~ George Alexander Gray and others v. Susan Mary Dawson and others, partition of land, etc. . Eliza Jane Anniss v.-Frederick. J: Rayner, trading as- the American Dental Parlours, claim, for.. .£250 . ~un'skilful-treatment...-. 'skilful-treatment...-. .> ,i .. ■ ■ :.'Frank'Maxwell Leckie 1 and Irene Myra L'Estelle' Leckie v. Ernest Eawson, claim for ,£786 195.-= 9d. for .-d&mages .-for bodily injuries. ■•' i. ' >< j Frederick-. Halesand othersyrspecificTierformance/etc. :

Albert Ernest Louis Bertlmg v.'John Norton, claim for. <£3000 damages for libel.., ...... , The South Pacific Mortgage and Deposit C 0.,: Ltd., v.- Francis London and Justinian John Kivernan Powell, claim for wSI6G 10s. 10d.,'due on a promissory, note; . J William Burgess and John Mitchell v. William -Vickers, claim foil £200. for breach of contract. The following; civil-cases, .which were to have been heard at' the_ November sittings", will, now be dealt with. 'Edward? Joshua Riddifords v., • George Foreman, . claim \fcr .£2OO, damages for trespass. Hamilton Gilmer and Allen Maguire v.; JosephsDwyer, claim; for .£IOOO damages for-failing to account. "William Sinclair v. Hugh Eraser arid James Alexander Fraser, claim for iM32 for commission. . ,

ifayor of Wellington and. others v. Italia Corich and tho Government Insurance Commissioner, claim lor possession, etc. -