Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FORT SEARCHLIGHTS.

CONSTEENATXON DOWN SOUTH. PEOJECTOES TAKEN iWAT. (By - Telegraph.—Special ■ ■<■-■>.- Christchurch, February 3. - ■" The ; receipt',' by?; the'; Christchurch -; and';; v Dunedin - branches ,:of ;therDe'ence ; ; De*; ;; ■ partment 'of peremptory. instructions" to remove; the: searchlights, which are. a very;;;' important factor ?, in;;; harbour ~ .defence ■; from Lyttelton axid' Danedin to Welling-;' ton 'and' Auckland .'has created something'' ;, like iconsternationi in,-yolunteer'. circles.;' here and'.'in the' 'southernjcity. -,;The. d©',,V. fence. authorities" in Christchuroh • have \ no ■ knowledge -: of. the.. reason's ~that 'hav«;i. ' induced the. /Defence. Office' 'in',.Welling.''.;;, ton' to issue/the; order,: andtinquiries; or.Sv, the'-siibject .'elicited a,.consensus, of;. opin«,;:; ion that the removal of, so' valuable, au adjunot to ,-the. defenceof-; the' port : oii:.! Lyttelton' was.'.a mistake of the gravest character.. Apart from the danger ol leaving ''the - port ■"in; such';, a., state, ,!the y. men -of the Naval Artilleryconld not, . possibly do their .wort, in; the .forta, without the aid of lights. .. . It /.was . pointed;- out. to a reporter who made that , ;one > : of -the.: most ? important: - features of .the inspection ... which-Lord.Kitchener would.make of the . port defences; during .his visit would- bo ' the illustration given by the 'Naval Artillery as .'to tho way in which they , would go to,;wbrk; in-. case. .a i hostile - cruiser, paid. . a visit, to .; Lyttelton.;This • demonstration .would,; in -.alii probability, ,be in; the' -.. shape ,of- a night., attack, 'and, of ooursej' •: without - the searohlights -to locate : the. position of 'the enemy, the men could do no effective work.. . v;.

. It- was further v jioihted out that the men of the two' divisions' of Naval. Artil-. lery/' in Lyttelton; and the! Naval Cadets devoted- a'.yerylargo amount: of' time, to making' themselves.:efficient... No.-': 1 Division ,had>> by 'dint-of 'hard practice, suoi, ceeded in'' getting. into-the ,first class for ■their gun Mvork,. and No.;, 2 ! also" would: have scored a: world's record had it nol been, for an acoident. ■ ; ' To■' find them- ; selves thus suddenly'deprived,- without any apparent reason," of 'one of the most jmportant adjuncts ..to. the work of mak* ing 'themselves: efficient.; for -the ■ deferiot of • Lyttelton is most disheartening.. ■■. -• There .is a" strong;' feeling.' amongst those interested ih defence! that the people ol Canterbury ■ should: take . the i.matter; ■ up, and: protest ; to - the {Defence' Department a(; Wellington against the, removalof the' searchlights. .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100204.2.50

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 733, 4 February 1910, Page 5

Word Count
371

FORT SEARCHLIGHTS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 733, 4 February 1910, Page 5

FORT SEARCHLIGHTS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 733, 4 February 1910, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert