Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

I (Before Mr. W.!.;G."Riddell, 8.M.)

POSTED IN THE MAIL VAN. • . : BUT STOLEN. ' ■' A yonth, ,«~ha.had been arrested by Detectiyo Aiidrewsi' .pleaded"* guilty •.at ".'the' Magistrate's Court yesterday to tiio theft of a chequo for ,£(i 25., drawn on tl.o Bank of Australasia at .Peilding.-',':' '.-'''l;': '■ '.Chief Detective 'Broberg. said, that the cheque:was the property of .Messrs. .Briscoe' and Company, and it'had' been posted on the train, at .'Shannon. .The letter did not. coino to.-.hand,., and subsequently the cheque reached th© bank, at Teilding.. : It 'Svas astotailled' that.' it' had. :heen .cashed at Paekakariki." . Detective 1 Andrews inado inquiries,' ;learnqd .from'acoused that :he had' found the chequer on. tho. railway lino at Paekakariki, and cashed it'at tho station in purchasing- a Tailiray. ticket. Accused, who was 18 years, of...age,'had been a rail'.vay • cadet for.; two years and: nine, months... 'Ho would.' have : access - to, the.van. of: .the train, and it;.was singular . that, '..should , havo found the letter! .911 the Railway line". This was the first appearance, of accused before a Court, and bis father' was;''willing- to refund the'amount of the: cheque.' l -.t :' Tho' magistrate cautioned .the lad, and convicted and ordered him to como ud

for. sentence when called upon, tho money to' be!refunded within seven days...

.OTHER CONVICTIONS. . : .

.. - ®vd ..first offenders for iV.drunkenness ;wero convicted and'"discharged,- and:anothei', who did not :'appear," was fined 10s!,. or:2i.hours..'-Thomas:.M'iaughlin, with two previous convictions,, was..fined. 20s„ 'in 'default seven days' imprisohment, for drunkenness.' Having been found helplessly; drunkr,at v llasterton; and remanded for medical treatment,.' Thomas M'Govern was ordered to 'pay'one'guinea 'expenses, in default! three days'- 'imprisonment.'. .Charles Armstrong and,. Harry White, alias; Brown,' 1 . admitted' ha'Ving caused, a -broach! of tho peace r .in Pipitea Street by: fighting, and thoy were each fined 20si, in default: seven •;; !■

CIVIL BUSINESS.

UNDEI'ENDED CASES: Judgment. Was-.given''.for..plaintiffs by default': in ;:tfce''following Leases:~James Smith,;Xtd.i vi'liennotli H/ Haire, £2 ; 45.lid., 'costs 55.; '.'Aiidrew Greggv. W." F. Lietz, i£22; 12s.;costs J!2 17a.; Fordo; and Co. v. Francis Ernest Brenmuhl, '£& 55., ;costs -14s.j;Eycjine -ilsobel- Winder;.' \v.' Kathleen Hidings, i 2. Is.' id., costs Cs.i :L.; M. ; Fitzgerald Wni.-'M.;Mtilan,>Bi 25.,- costs 105.,7 Jessio Packer, v.-.Barnes,' : .£3,.,;. costs : 10s!";y.New Zealand , Shipping Gazkte-Co.,' Ltd.; : ;v.. AC''l'.;-Almond, :JU ■12s. Sd.i.' costs '£!■ ss. Gd;; : G. 'H; Thornton v. ;Mrs.' 'Maud' Oliver Cussack, .£s' 12s.' Bd., costs £1 3s.' .6(1.; "George' and George v, R. J.: NcsbUf; S& 25.':6 d., costs '10s.; 'Arthur. Hall v. Mary Carr;. .£5; 12s;. 6d„ costs- Bs.) Vrederiok: D. Lnks v. Derbv Boyce, '£7 -10s., costs .£1 Bs. (3;i.; 11. Prico ; and. C 0.,. Ltd., v. Jus. August Boyd, .£l3 75.. fid., costs XI ss. Gd.; Arnold Berg v. Sarah Donovan, .fil 7s„ costs- 7s. ;• Freder-. -iokr Geo. . Bolton ;'v. Roland Denham Craig, .£5, costs, "'JBI.; Os. Cd.; Bates . and Lees v., Robt. Collett, M 155.,-costs 10s.; Hamerton, Andrew, and Webb V; Robert Hayward Fisher, 11.75.,* , costs , 5&;.Waiter', Newton'. : v. : - 'Louisa. Harding Too•ihdr,'-. £20; sameVv;' same,: "JB2O j '.same: v. W. Wilson, £i.

JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. ; In: tho judgmehtVsummons-xdse, Percy; Siinti; v^'--Thos.:;;o'-Neil,' ! ordered- to pay .-CI-8s; : Bd.S6n-Ibr'..be{ore. :January:?3l,''.in', default;,three days'>.imprisonment..-: ... --: ■' <...

i'Joseph r Amoretty ' 1 was ' ordered .to pay Thos.:,.Burt': JE66" Us. lid.on .or before Februnirjr- lOj iir.default; one: month's imprisonment.-.. y ;.

:, No orders were; made ia tho following oases;— Cyril -Paget' v.,Wm.,.Fitz'patribkj: a : -il9s.;'-.Otas, Ridding, ; ; v. Robert Hare.Va' dfebt of > rico and .C 0,,! Ltd., v. Yi. H.. Matthowe, a .debt of ; 16s. 5d.; . Wellington: Publish'ingiCo;, Wd:,: v.'.Harry? Scoonei, -a. debt 'of JCi lGs. y-^-V-- -':,'- : y- ' :: ,

' ■ PARTNERSHIP ACCOUNTS.'

yln .the case of .'the' - Stewart-yTimbor; Glass; and Hardware Co., Ltd., vJ Stephen Henry-.Matt'erson and John Edward"Fitzgerald,.vMr. :: .T. y.W.- Hislop • appeared for >the; plaintiff company, y .'.S/' .J. : Moran for ~ defendants. y-Tho : evidence' brought;■ out .that defendants. hid y,beon carrying - on: 'business iii- Wellington as , builders... Before:: the ' partriershipwas dissolved,.' Mattorsoni had -obtained from tlje' plaintifF company'a quantity of tools. Mat£erson ; :admitted liability, --butAFitzgerald contended that : the dissolution of the partnership;had freed him-.'from payment: of ; the ; account. ' Judgment was fiven ior-.tho -plaintiff - company, -against latters'o'n, for ,£6.10., r .with:: Bs. . costs, • 4nd,-against Fitzgerald, ;13s. 9d,, With'jel 1-iS. Costs. . .

A PROMISSORY NOTE.

W. and G. Turnbull and Co.: claimed from' Anton Bernhard ■ Thomsen', settlor; of Mangatera/ theVsum of 476. 19s. sd.y amount- of a dishonoured; promissory note,-with'-interest.:.. Mr.; 1 Foil ' appeared for plaintiffs,, and -Mr. - Gray 1 for defendant. After; hearing evidence, the' 1 -- magistrate gave judgment for defendant, with 16s. costs,

INDUSTRIAL CASE.

BREAD FOR THE HOLIDAYS. . In the case of Walter Newton, Inspector of ■ Awards, v. Henry . Denhard; baker, of Willis' Street, - the claim ;was jfor. £10, for alleged breach of the Bakers' Award, in that : - defendant had. employed .bakers '.'on December, 23 last, between the' hours of .10 p.m. and midnight. Mr.-J..J. M'Grath,who appeared for defendant, held that' an employer might' commence..work at. any timo.to .suit the' convenience, of his customers. In/this: instance, : i'defehdant had' Ihad- .to , supply his customers'Svith' bread for four days,: he; paid* his: employees overtime,..' Judgment was -reserved. r j

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19100126.2.92

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 725, 26 January 1910, Page 13

Word Count
823

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 725, 26 January 1910, Page 13

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 725, 26 January 1910, Page 13

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert