Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MILITARY INQUIRY.

; THE KNYVETT CASE. ■ r PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS.: ■ EEGULATIONS ; ANI) METHOD OP ■ : DISCUSSED. : : ; ; (By Tele E r<iDh.-si>eelal CorreioondenU •. m '.'■ ' .':■:". Auckland, December 21.'rho inquiry into the charges against Captain I'. 11. Knyvett, No. 1 Company Auckland Qarnson Artillery, in connection, with thelottershe. sent to tho Minister for Defence concerning Colonel Robin was thrown open to the press; Ihe inquiry commenced this morning, and was mainly remarkable for.the:number :of points and objections raised ty.Captain Knyvett. Tho rn? m eo i lsi v te 4r of Li <sutenant-Colonel Chaytor (Wellington), Major' Sandman .(Wellington), and Captaim Bosivorth (Auckland). In add ' hon to Captain Knyvott, Lieutenants PUllen and Greenfiough, of tho'No.' 1 presont. Colonel Woolfe (O.C Aucffid tnety present, .but took no part in tho proceedings. .■ . 'rwPJ 0 ? i ' len . ,; ' ssatedt ated that in New Zealand u nSaterSfish^rW^ry cause «t Heme, a Court of Inquirv waslhV ame viLF ' s. mary ln ? ulf y New Zealand; Therefore .it,was only, fair that the rules of martial. Iherp was no poorer.of punishment TW % 1 ' sh i ;o « r t of InenirJ, while a £ e L^ a J and -, C ??r t '/ ,f 1 I ?«l« i »y"W-the power court-martialj henco ; tho decision -to follow more the rules, of jirocedure of the.•court' martial, than the Court of Inquiry. S VsZpTtOi K . n >; Tett "ked what secfion of the *<<™, Zpaland law covered the case. Colonel.Chaytor said,the only section that it under was that reforring to inZealand, defence regulations. .■■",-.

;■ ->;..A Question of. Privilege. ;/ - After, some: disputation, on'this obint tiii accused officer d.W the" attention of he K'S 1011 m d _> regulations,.which &et out that, every officer,,has 'the right to wtw wyl? 1, -There, is ,no question you that ™. ■ W r fh Pfper channel, or C n J W.•.^β■ right;to senS a letter; but ier v ? d # :^W: tho.let act, and! auii Dntitled.to know what ?RTh extracts; ar *;SeS ! ■■■• Tho 1 * >»*-«. -wi-v-i respect; sir, that the ,whoo charra is;wron B ly'.laid witted "/,? "f" 1 tho , t or * tl>at '! 5«o-£_!' .rnitted ; an I want; to know;.what it _ Colonel Chaytor:l: atd in : the same r difficnltv' *hii OU I £,M *tM?V ha 3 Si-advict "the ace' Ik tfc M * thlDk ? e - musk h °l d that , •<W • #■ t Kg 1 . Br ee made,in the letter."' ■■ ' TinfeS f ?3rTc i ta flection was disallowed. Uptain Knyrett asked' the Court'if he could (referrpto^LS; /The BuVho.'is a^solicitorl'-He -. Uptain Knyvett::But :X claim that 'it' ia' I l fr™ / y right obtain the" assistaaci : o S«n fw I?ft,i Wt" ,111 ? , that ' the -™*' JuKS arc a Lourt of.lnquiry. • - . , '■'~ \ ba c ° ur t ••:•■ disallowed :■" Captaini : ixrnWk .^^■t^a^

;.; :; • Captain Knyvett's; Statement. "• ' : M j 'In opening ■Uβ;;statement. Captain "Knvvott him to fM a " in H and '"'erred' SJ^ ld ,M,K give -S^'to ■«howOT •: the charges'were ..ri ff ht.or.-TO)nK stated, that *thi Court w g ould g J μ-w °P lmon > <md that ;their opinion would bo RiTon in a closed Court. ■ T ulon ■-.Captain Knyrott asked foraan expression 'ol The President: Ton did not ; break the' reinimmmm tna^ri fW* •'' : &£<*!«* consider^then that I had- the, right.,to send a letter com? pWg^about'a.superior o fficDr .. In order to , obtain'redress'^ 'Jj* :the. ohar B e: : here\i a : ttsf submitted that according to ld : b6^ antedi * .. The .President 'in ■'forwardinc '■■ a L°f? he-,r °V ld i l=e justified in' eendmgVa ;;r Tho President:, No.. ■':■',' - ;, r ' '■,V ; ;■:.''

v" ; -■■■'■■ , ;J :V : '^ : .':the; . ; -; v/" ,-;;; v .Captain ■■■ Knyvetti ;t ; ■> consider: that- the are totally distinct m every -way from the char .e,es ngainst me in this court I' would, like to point out that it is, usua" undfAfflLltary,reßulalillnsthatbef <>«'Placing ?Y»?r e eny n 2 d j !lv a " e ?t, » preliminary -Luir? "^r?^ ,1 ? ?j «"> sort-was, done ip my case. • Yet. it is laid down, most distinctly \ am jusV pointing this out to show that In my personal caso.the usual Regulations were not ap-

The President: Itfmay bV'so, tut it 'is hot compulsory. Both the'Defence-Act" and thl< vplunter. regulations state; that .an officer :-maV i tip ordered under arrest ■;■•-.■•*• - ' •Captain Knyvettt Yes, bat after 'in -inquiry surely I was not considered to-be such an'awful andjdangerous man as ail-that;;> ?"; ™ : -Captain -Kuytett: next. asked who was■ the officer ithat iplaced- him , under arrest, and bv whose:.ordetß'was he; placed; under, arrest. ';' > . The President :-l know nothing about that: i Captain Knyvett: I was informed by tho ofcommanding the district that ho was or. dorod, to place■nip under arrest. ;Ho gavo mo this information at my. request, and I should now «1. J? -??\ fcvhaxi instructions -I was thus, placed. It. has been elated m the.papers all ovorthe, country that the officer commanding the district placed meundef arrest, but when I asked him ho eaid it was hot so. > .The President: As a matter of fact ho did, but it was according to instructions. : " ~ Captom-Knyyett-went on to ask that the evidence taken at the Court of Inquiry, held in November should bo produced. • , v Tho President:; Well; tho evidence takon at the court of, inquiry-— ' , , : ■ .- ' ~. Captain ICnyvett: Is the tale of the whole inquiry.,-It-was as a result of my letter dealing with that matter that I am now under arrest.: .: ; . .-. ~ ■ .;: The Rule of Procedure.; ■ . The President: Hero again w<3 conio to the difference between our Court and a full Court of Inquiry.' If you look uppago79, "Military tm,' r - or page. 522 on rule of;procedure you will see that.it is set forth : that the proceedings; at acourt of inquiry: aro not to bo used ns evidencQ in the higher court. Captain ICnyvott: Is this, then, ■ a : hinhor Court? •'■:■ .. ■• " ; - : -: ;/ - .:,: ; '-:v,.' l^: Tho Prosidont: This is a higher Court'than a .'■ Court of preliminary inquiry. Tho first inquiry was merely to allow a superior officer to dooido whethor thoro.is eullicfent evidonco to warrant tho; holding- of \a; Court of Im quiry. :.'-- : ' • >.-- '■.■'.■■'■■■;■.■'•■■:'.■.■■■•:■■,■■■'.. :. v Caßtaio- rA-nJ I eubmli *lnt\ the

otlici Couit hos (livlnittly n preliminary Out ot hiqujij on iii.a insu It is a matter ,' ot gittVQ couain. It lius oliojdy cost mo huii- ' dreds of poundb iu my business, and has aflocted me In many ways. Iho court was cleared while tlic point was decided, , Captain Knyvett reiterated the point that the charges now- being inquired into uero substantially different from those upon which I ho was arrested. Tor throe weeks ho had I been without knowing what was going to bo s wn a ? d an , a PP llca tion had bcon sent on to I Wellington asking either that i the charges bo l gone on with, or that he lb relieved from ' j arrost, but nothing was donsj and then sud. denly on Saturday last, tlwso new charges ' " j were laid against him. .{ At his request, tho Court noted hie objection I ■ that ho considered that the charge was unusual . J and improper. Captain Knyvett further complainod that the ' time was insufficient to allow the calling ot " jutnesses as prescribed for in the regulations. This objection was also noted. «"*•«"». nffnn" a- 0 " Y, ent on to urge that the offence disclosed in the charge was no offci.ee fh f l £ I ? lh / ary aw> He also complained that extracts from his letter to the Minister ' for Defence had been so ehom of their context > •as to con^ f y qu,te a different impression to what was intended to bo conveyecf, 3VS SVrtporttUr VhL , , letter? OSCnt: D ° y ,,11 admit BeniJijl ß «*• c ,»;PWn Knyvettl 1 do. In r n a g y s°o U t0 6hoff aat WSS iffi The CharjM Reviewed. ' i i W n1 P h ,n Knyv ? tt the chargw brought against him, charactemmg sonorf b fefpwsiaifsis£ session certain doeumonts which, if published! jould create a sandal throughout the - wherein lay ; the. offence. Ho contended' there ivas none in tho bare fact 'of Mm posseS them documents ' so lo °S as ho did not steal ' upon this'point, and decided;, to strike out v the particular charce, fraS . v Captain Knyvett intimated that he has fortj .witnesses to'call,' ■'■• ". ■■' ~ ■'■■•?. * '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091222.2.53

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 696, 22 December 1909, Page 7

Word Count
1,313

MILITARY INQUIRY. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 696, 22 December 1909, Page 7

MILITARY INQUIRY. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 696, 22 December 1909, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert