Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

POLITICAL NEWS.

CIVIL SERVICE INQUIRY,

'•} Jfr. STassey stated ih. the House yesterdhy . afternoon that it had teen stated in the news-. ' papers, 'ho believed" correctly,that- an • inquiry : was being held by two judges■ into the ttotkiui; of one of thb most, important Departments of State. He would * like to know it the»judges ;-hid'ftifnished'their tho JPrilnd ; Minister intended-toVlay it before Parliament. : 'Sir''Joseph Wiinl'said ■'tho' stateUlent Was Correct that two judges had hwin appointed to, 1 :, inquire into certain matters regarding; iin important Department and ihto chavues against ; the: i chief; executive offlcdi:' bf the Ddpartriienti ..The report' had not yet been and Tfrhon' it waS received tho Government .would Consider it. ■ •• "V; Mr. Mafesey: Will it he laid before the Hbu&ef The-. Pfifne. Ministdt-' said that; if the report Iteferfed -tri spilvatej business-of i-peofle with the Tax 'Department : the Government would not bring it boforo the House. • Mr.'T. Ii: Taylor (Ohristchuroh North) asked iif .that- faft fof.ths retortifeferting to .offliers' would,come bofbre Parliament,; Sutely if the conduct' of public', officers/,was : in ,question thd House had a right to/know .whether : their con- " duet had. .been .-successfully '" impeached, or whether ■ they. "were clear' of serious charges• of' maladministration."- -" ; f,' • The l'riirie 'AHnistdr said -the .Government ;had'nbt;yet received tho report. 'When it was received'no. would'be very glad to inform the Houso .what tho Government intended to. do. : At: present; ho did, not ■ kn6w What was in 1 the teportj .diid he could hot anticibato .it. ' ■ GOVERNMENT AND LftMO aIIESTtON.

"Unofficial statements In ■ regard to the GoVernmentcaiietis' yesterday ttornJtig ahow that ithero \vm" considerable discussion In .regard to the land proposals, ahdj :as might be expected) there tvhs a fereat :tliversltr -of .'Opinion. - The leaseholders were ifl' the tainoHty, and . had to cohtehti.-tHemVelyes -jTith' giving 1 thfeir -dissatisfnfctioh ail airing. The decision to ngreo td the : Priino..iMiflistCt l 's. recommendation t0 < re* ji3SemWo'aiter .Onristmas in; tho event of- the business! being Unfinished-was, it appears, not quite dnahiiiioUs, there being 'one dissentient, ltij said that Mr.' : BauWa whs tho dissenting member,'. although no authorised sttttdtiieilt on that point is available;' Mtvllitnah; the menlber. ;for>lhiercdtgllli-who'lfe -strohglf Opposed to the j,ttttud6 which tho Gftverilment ha* takoh.up, on the laid (Juestian,:did not attend tllO cMcUS..

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091117.2.21

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 666, 17 November 1909, Page 7

Word Count
366

POLITICAL NEWS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 666, 17 November 1909, Page 7

POLITICAL NEWS. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 666, 17 November 1909, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert