Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

I) %i_ asitting of tlio . Supreme'. Court, in Banco, JDdwards, 1 Uobpe^ 1 William tjiiatiiitfty p,n\|' plunder,' of Gisborne, 'I'Tuupis 1 (Sporgp' 'Bijijirc l ? owler, Stokes,-manufacturing'^plumbers .carrying.'on"' business as .V;: and -W. Fowler, :6i AiipjijaßUy j /yersqsf',; ,' Hsfdjjtf ; : ,aud > Hardley, ; Limited, pi Au'pVlaiid. NMivfp^tt,"]Cb;^litbr: ; Kim%p%ler, .that -tap tinie'ipr ;moving i'br. 'judgment should bo erf^od.;,' Aij,■;.'Weston, instructed 'by Mr. ; Earl appeared for' defendants.- ■.•'•' '.'■' ;■ The'facts placed'before: the Cburt tyere' that fliatntiftV-'ivere'> proprietors'',of.; a" .p'atejjt; •for' Wade's I|ap,to,ve.(j ylrpnf. SKyllgW: IVaBlSi • ;B* •leudiiiits... pad' another patpht. j lor "a 1 skylight 'ftja : plaiutiftsr'clainled to 'be".'an iia.frjlipment'qf/./their l#wt'.' : ■ : An,"apfibh /was commenced: by 'plaintiffs, arid -statement of •dofencb . was $led, \denymgj the:; infringement.. I'he notion was.rpferrpd'to arbitration,' and'tlia •arbitrators,-, after ' h'patinj; made'-"an ■ i itho. award, 'Bjajptip, wejo. anjjjbu'a' tb' got ;t'iirther time,and iraed counsel-Tor" defendants lp cjplay theimotion; -.Th!? tf'as agreed' to upon cijrtijin.', conditions,- . a\id' v ari':agrp'emetit' fva's drawn' up betweci| counsel- fop- the. parties 'em'; bodying...those.; conditions.-'.'iTho .agreement 'stated: ;that -the defendants' ..motion sho'uld :s,tand, ■ Aqifiuriiecl. for; three .weeks,, and '-if' at W e :s:fld. of ,th a t; period plaintiffs had-not'set down.'a'v motion -to 'the' findings' of ith'c judgment .'should' be u; forthwith : 'et for/the-.defendants, with/put p.bjection/ bn mi Vm :'°* the plaintiffs.. ■ '■■ By a slip on the part r pf. a olerk in the office- of, 'plaintiff's s.bHp»tors,.the'notice of m,otian, although'served ■JiW- th ?. ''sPWitbra for;-, defehdtmts, -was'not filed- within -the 'three'-week's'.' ! "If was actually filed -a- day or two after; th>' last;day" fixed by ,fcw- agreement. ■•..This Mas 'a motion by .'plain•B" 3 ,,* 0 , 'extend by one week the .'time allowed ,in the- agreement. '-' : :,:■;.. ,- -\v-' • ■%■'■ -. j;Tho':';poiirt;. heard -•argument,.,- and 'reserved •■:.-;;.■■'.o. ->' y- : : ;~;^:-;;;:":r*S"

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091104.2.62

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 655, 4 November 1909, Page 9

Word Count
273

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 655, 4 November 1909, Page 9

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 655, 4 November 1909, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert