SUPREME COURT.
I) %i_ asitting of tlio . Supreme'. Court, in Banco, JDdwards, 1 Uobpe^ 1 William tjiiatiiitfty p,n\|' plunder,' of Gisborne, 'I'Tuupis 1 (Sporgp' 'Bijijirc l ? owler, Stokes,-manufacturing'^plumbers .carrying.'on"' business as .V;: and -W. Fowler, :6i AiipjijaßUy j /yersqsf',; ,' Hsfdjjtf ; : ,aud > Hardley, ; Limited, pi Au'pVlaiid. NMivfp^tt,"]Cb;^litbr: ; Kim%p%ler, .that -tap tinie'ipr ;moving i'br. 'judgment should bo erf^od.;,' Aij,■;.'Weston, instructed 'by Mr. ; Earl appeared for' defendants.- ■.•'•' '.'■' ;■ The'facts placed'before: the Cburt tyere' that fliatntiftV-'ivere'> proprietors'',of.; a" .p'atejjt; •for' Wade's I|ap,to,ve.(j ylrpnf. SKyllgW: IVaBlSi • ;B* •leudiiiits... pad' another patpht. j lor "a 1 skylight 'ftja : plaiutiftsr'clainled to 'be".'an iia.frjlipment'qf/./their l#wt'.' : ■ : An,"apfibh /was commenced: by 'plaintiffs, arid -statement of •dofencb . was $led, \denymgj the:; infringement.. I'he notion was.rpferrpd'to arbitration,' and'tlia •arbitrators,-, after ' h'patinj; made'-"an ■ i itho. award, 'Bjajptip, wejo. anjjjbu'a' tb' got ;t'iirther time,and iraed counsel-Tor" defendants lp cjplay theimotion; -.Th!? tf'as agreed' to upon cijrtijin.', conditions,- . a\id' v ari':agrp'emetit' fva's drawn' up betweci| counsel- fop- the. parties 'em'; bodying...those.; conditions.-'.'iTho .agreement 'stated: ;that -the defendants' ..motion sho'uld :s,tand, ■ Aqifiuriiecl. for; three .weeks,, and '-if' at W e :s:fld. of ,th a t; period plaintiffs had-not'set down.'a'v motion -to 'the' findings' of ith'c judgment .'should' be u; forthwith : 'et for/the-.defendants, with/put p.bjection/ bn mi Vm :'°* the plaintiffs.. ■ '■■ By a slip on the part r pf. a olerk in the office- of, 'plaintiff's s.bHp»tors,.the'notice of m,otian, although'served ■JiW- th ?. ''sPWitbra for;-, defehdtmts, -was'not filed- within -the 'three'-week's'.' ! "If was actually filed -a- day or two after; th>' last;day" fixed by ,fcw- agreement. ■•..This Mas 'a motion by .'plain•B" 3 ,,* 0 , 'extend by one week the .'time allowed ,in the- agreement. '-' : :,:■;.. ,- -\v-' • ■%■'■ -. j;Tho':';poiirt;. heard -•argument,.,- and 'reserved •■:.-;;.■■'.o. ->' y- : : ;~;^:-;;;:":r*S"
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091104.2.62
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 655, 4 November 1909, Page 9
Word Count
273SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 655, 4 November 1909, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.