Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUEZ CONCESSION.

TERMS; OE EXTENSION. 1 ' THE COMPANY'S PAYMENTS TO EGYPT. '"ro'l'jl MILLIONS AND PROFITS.. ; i . (By, Telegraph -prtss Assoclp-tlort—Copyright.) . (Itec. November 1, 10.35 p.m.) . : London, November -1. ■ ..The Suez Canal Convention, 1 embodying th 6 terms of the proposed extension : for forty years of the . Stiez Maritime Ganal. Company's concession,., has; t)pen submitted to the- jjgyptian Council of' Ministers/: It proposes -to 'prolong .the .concession (which expires in 1068) till 2008, In return-for tho : prolong'ntiort of the conI cession Egypt will receive >the sum of M,000,000 i payable ill four yearly instalments beginning |in 1910. It. is agreed that this, four millions i shall bp exclusively devoted to 1 irrigation, railways, or other remunerative expenditure, or to the amortisation of tho debt, ■ '...Egypt will also share in tho company's annual profits on the fallowing ascending' scale t—? .' After 1921 Egypt receives ...... 4 per ofcnt. „ ,1981 „ „ 6 „ , lfii „ „ ...... 8 „ „'. -, » i'«i „ . „ *....,io „ , „ .11)61 „ „ 12 „ „ „ 1(169 , „ „ 50 „ , „ After 1989 half .thq qnnual net profits go to Egypt., If in any year tho l profits are below one hundred million francs, tho Company ..takes fifty million francs and Egypt takes nothing. • _ <■" - ■ EgJTi .is entitled to half tho Company's assets upon. the expiry of . tho conoeesiori. _ [Owing to tho excessive rates charged by the Suez Maritime Canal Company, ft soheine was formulated ii} the 'eighties to another canal parallel to the existing on? by (itt. indcpendentcompany,dnd.the,m<)iiey was freely Tho easting company then took legal opinion as •,to its' concession.' claimed 1 a monopoly of canal construction through tho isthmus; and niade an appeal to the Court at Grenoble; which it eoulcl do. tader the' capitulations. ; The French. Court, gaye- its .decision' in favour ,of v tlie existing company,', but. tho then rate 9 wore substantially reduced, though shipping interests still consider them to be unduly high.l -'I'

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19091102.2.32

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 653, 2 November 1909, Page 5

Word Count
303

SUEZ CONCESSION. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 653, 2 November 1909, Page 5

SUEZ CONCESSION. Dominion, Volume 3, Issue 653, 2 November 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert