Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING.

Sir,—As, an' individual I sympathise with The Dominion in its protest "against the. embargo that has been placed upon. it by Cabinet (npjwrontly) in respect of -Government advertising. As ; a taxpayer I cravo space to protest against the criminal waste of the oountry's. funds entailed, in tho existing conduct of such advertising; This is a •point, Vhiob, was not touched by you in, your spirit ' protest the. other day against tho curious discrimination tbat is. being, made against-'you. but I think you will agree with .mo that it has a.very important bearing on; the ,wh'ole /question; as well'.as. / the!' caso .stated. As. one who has .some knowledge of the-extent of tho existing ■ scandal—and I .will endeavour to show that it is a' scandal —and a, pretty accurate'idea of the actual . annual, cost of, Government advertising, >1 ■ say that, thousands of pounds, are annually waßted.in absolutely useless official notifications without the slightest warrant or justification.,- , - Take .the . advertisement on which your .oomplaint was based! It consists of-121 invitations for tenders for mail services.. The first eight relate solely to Alfrcdton. All ore alternative services. Now, I'll guarantee that any office boy ,who has the remotest ac-quaintance-with the .'art o advertising :would at, once suggest that these same tenders could each be indicated in four lines of type (instead of ; 4 inches at a cost/of, say, 165.), , and that tbe general;'notificatioii attached at; the foot .of'; tu'e., advertisement, saying that specifications could be seen at : the -principal . pi>st offices of fhe .diStricts .cohcernM would be all that would be, requjred. 'I take the case of Alfred ton, as-a typical; example"; the whole advertiseihent,:. however,. is bristling with similar; evidences of stupidity.'." Instead' of two columns of type in a daily paper, the full purpose of, the' advertisement' would ■bo achieved by the ; publication of 'a five or sixinch notification.; ,It co.Uld-be inserted in the. thiee : local dailies, and the. weeklies' too, for that, matter, and still , the. Government would bo saved an expenditure' of soino £15 (oh the actualHransactiori under notice). ■ The .present -System ;is the-curse' of Gov---efnment advertising. It is ; an: undeniable -fact,' that; Government.,advertisements '.are inserted wholesale in tho newspapers of . tho right'colour, all over ' the country, without the slightest regard, for economy,or the-pos-sible or probable ■■ usefulness of such notifications. Of course, y everybody who knows anything aboiit the subject is aware'thattho Government is' legally bound to . publish various kinds of. notifications "in a. newspa,per or newspapers circulating in the dig-, trict" affected, but my complaints is that no attempt is made at-the condensation ;of such announcements, 4 and'that the direct re- • suit vis ah<. enormous and scandalous waste jf public money.' ; -. ~ - - ', ' ' -'. Somp; time . ago. it was Announced that, a certain individual or -individuals..'had..- teen, appointed to take, charge of the-Government • advertising,, with a view to exercising a little economy.- . 'Well, judging by, the, re1 1 suits one',Would imagine thai; economy has been thrown to tho winds, and that.patronage, and! bias are the only guiding principles : recognised, in .the management' or-the buai-, ness. It. would pay; the. Government a thousand, times-over ...to. select . a man with' , a thorough knowledge of advertising aid a due ' regard for the considerationtlie GovehimentoiyesthG,unfortunate taxpayers to take charge'of .'this branch of the public! service ; arid" run it on ; business 'lines. I am certain .tliat'the, count : ry! would be, saved at least £10,000 per year, ,aiid : The Dominion would not be 1 obliged to rcriiain in the position: of:.'being : , r .th'p,,'one-/solitary' daily news-, pap'er' in'tbis cbuntTy- that', is {tinder- tfooiban, so- far. as a 'share,in . iaVconecrned. j .The Government,' in short', could afford—or .pretend— to. be /without, bias;- and every newspaper could be: treated witli a" due regard'for tho valiio of'the publicityl t«>v bp received' in i tho particular' circumstances <of ; 'eacli'.'case.. : ' Political I would be. no-ban to justice and-fair dealing. I cannot help thinking that if Tnii Dominion- took-.tins - matter-up' it - would bo I doing -a valuable public" service; while at tho same timo it would indirectly be doing a I great deal to secure a recognition of its own i rights—l am, etc:, . , ' I TAXPAYER. August 22. , .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090824.2.48.1

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 594, 24 August 1909, Page 6

Word Count
685

GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 594, 24 August 1909, Page 6

GOVERNMENT ADVERTISING. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 594, 24 August 1909, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert