Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RUBBISH AND THE DESTRUCTOR.

. Sir,—There is '. one ' item :in Inspector : Doyle's annual report in which' I-heartily ogreo, viz. : • ('That-.-if''the .-city is to havo full advantago of the destructor it shonld.be accessible- ;tof'the. householders in the way • of disposing of rubbish. After .myexpen--1 enco lean i quite,-understand .why rubbish, is deported,:. in the early 1 morning. or. late .at night, in any .vacant spot . or; right-of-way, * to, annoyance/ or the owners. One day last weekj. taking advantage of a holiday from businessj' I did a little clearing up in' my flower garden, the result. of -which ; .was a ■ barrow-load ■ or two of. garden.'rubbish.. As, I reside, in a very congested neighbourhood,. I did noti on 1 ac? count .of the risk; of . fire; apply for a permit to. "burn "in the. open, but decided to send it to the , destructor, some hundred yards away: -.That rubbish had. al long journoy, and oost ihe- something in the :'wity of cartage. Thoy rcfuaed to talfe it. at UiodeBtructor/. also at- the . Harbour Uo.vrd tip at Pipitea, and',at'Jpiri Tin Gully." Back to the Town Hall, .the carter, evontually getting a permit' from the.lnspoctor.to filially' deposit it . in Jam Till Gully. -'' As' I- our new destructor- would '■ copevwith > a •.city; iof much- larger Bize .tliaii Wellington, and-.was designed with; that .object/;I ; fail to see ..why they should-refuso to .bum rubbish iwhen .it is'-taken there;' I,think-every facility should begiven.tb- housoholders to dispose of their rubbish if-it is taken, to the destructor,'and thereby enoourago, citizon« to keep , the ckan.—l am, etc., ' RATEPAYER, v. [When .seen on the matters '* referred. to/in the letter—which 'has. been dolayed iiri' publication—Mr. W. H-. Morton, • City! Engineer, stated. that there had never ■ been, .ally regulations as to-.the refuse to be destroy<jd in the- new •: destructor or the old one: . Some people .had ail idea that,every; dp6<!ripticril of rubbish 'should ' go there,® and be< destroyed' straight away, without any.: charge. ,He iriairitaind..,'that. •! the' only -responsibility, 'devolviiig on the.councir vvaa .the- destruction of household ': refuse'; -. .-tiedestructor .was not in- ■ tended to deal with young trees. If the kind of material ;to be destroyed ' is extended to include almost all kinds of rubbish a; very much largor' stafE will be required.-]' 1 . ;■=

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090624.2.17.2

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 542, 24 June 1909, Page 5

Word Count
367

RUBBISH AND THE DESTRUCTOR. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 542, 24 June 1909, Page 5

RUBBISH AND THE DESTRUCTOR. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 542, 24 June 1909, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert