Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

CRIMINAL SITTING. THREE PRISONERS SENTENCED. .1 Among a batch of prisoners who -cauio. up for; sentence beforo Mr. Justice Chapman ;r, yesterday.yas. Gc'orgo Allon, alias Richard* bod, .who had forged and uttered'a chequo Carterton, Vand had i subsequently commit-' -tod.a/similar offonoo at Mangaweka. The Crown Prosecutor .'said that prisoner > ;bad/reoord. v:His. first .pflenco/.wa? tho. tli^i;of/.:apiettdr.:'at: l : ho was sentenced to twelve -months'.iihprisonmont at Blenheim on two charges of: iorg- ■. cry and {also protenccs/ Lastly,lie received. , a sentence of three" months for tlioft of.. . a bicycle! 'His Honour. remarked that it was., clear that prisoner had entered upon, a career of four:offences, on four, dis•K.tihct/occasiens)'.;aiid the had received did not - spem .to have had a v fialutaryieffect.' As ho Vascharged under . two nameSj lio ivould bo sentenced separately,' ;-4>H©'f.i?btild^b6-'>rdord4.>to'- ; W. 'imprisoned; for i bo concurrent. GRANTED PROBATI6N. '■■■ Theft of a.cheque which ho afterwards lit* "tored was-'.the oifenco ;-';for .'which Arthur Praise waj set forward. ; Tho Grown Prosecutor .'said that. prisoner. . arrived in New Zealand fiom. Hobart about 'eight months ago. Por.a timo.ho worked at ■tho Blackball mine,' and not much was known ebout him. Ho would-suggest thai: the money . .found .ill prisoner's possession and;wages: . • due to him should go to meet the amount of . which prosecutor had been defrauded. US': '-Replying ,to . a'; question, ' 'prisoner stated : ;; • ;sug:'^:'Bb^cd;iioiyd;be'adopted.[;-;; ' ••. •-: ;;i u His Horiour said hb ;did not. know, but■: that prisoner to probation. In regard to one of . the oharges ho -would admit prisoner to. • probation i :for ; - two'' ..years, ~ and. with • respect to the other he would bo ordered to ■ coma up for sentenco-when called upon. Tho condition on which such a Icttiont sentence .was passed was that the.£4 15s. 6d. found on . EriOTrier^and,v t i>li©twagesVdue.;to! iih should;bb/hßM^^bveri':H-v v-'j''; £ "Itiseems' to ;be ;al)6ut time;,that; the'Co'tirt' ceased to grant. probation'-hi cases of this • ki-ndy . as their number' is increasing,, but 1 do not like to send a young fellow to gaol I oan help it," added his Honour. : 'THEFT FROM 'A HOTEL. ' Tho next prisoner who was placed in tho .idook -was Jolin T. Driscoll;-.who had,pleaded ... guilty to a: charge ' of: having ■ jstolen somo V clothes froni tho City Buffet Hotel. • vi. The Crown Prosecutor said -.that practic-, ally nothing, was known-about prisoner; who arrived ■: in -rNew ■ Zealand. ■ from 1 England •in - ,: .'His Honour .obsorved that the. Probation ; i \:,.officer'^stated;;that;. ; hefhad not,,yetyhad : time ' to get a full report. Sentence • would therefore be deferred: until Monday -nest. . A UNIQUE CASE. ;; .What -was described- as . ,Trap then considered, . tho' prisonor being - -Rose • H'lnnes;. ■ who had falsely '.'stated on oath that she had >hoon: deserted by a man,. : :deolaredi was ; h,er vhiisbahd, but to' .whom, in faqt, :sbe .wa\ not: married. \ .v".The Crown -said , that nothing .was iknown; against the prisoner.' She had, ..he: continued; -.sinco .married -tha man :who she had previously sworn was her husband. His Honour-i-said ythat prisoner's excuse .was- that. she ' did not•. know 'the Jaw',.', but? tho Court coujd: hardly: believe. that. -If ho v sent her ito .gaol' her-prospects would bo i">- - , perilled. :Ho would order her to come up for sentence when-'called upon.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090520.2.74.1

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 512, 20 May 1909, Page 9

Word Count
516

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 512, 20 May 1909, Page 9

SUPREME COURT. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 512, 20 May 1909, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert