Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IMMORAL LITERATURE.

NEED FOR SUPPRESSION. ] OPINIONS OF TWO BISHOPS. . fol.TKEQlfAl'n—ritESS ASSOCIATION.) Chrlstchurch, May 12. - 'A largo deputation, composed of a number -of minister* of religion, school teachers, and others, :laid :bcfoio -the;. Premier -to-day the ' necessity' for further legislation to provenfc .tho .dissemination ,of immorol and obscene literataro. v v , :, Bishop. Grimes ■: said tho objeot of tho dq-..-.,putotion::']md.vbis.'.degpest-.sympa%.'''"'"°Ue' . :-lolt sure .that, as soon as Sir. Joseph' Ward was; made- awaro of " the - growing ovil -in ; th^'spread.'of ' immodest,: indecent,' . ; rand filthy literature,- ho would do' all-In - hie powor to stop it. .. It was difficult to suggest tho remedy, but -as 'stringent stops wero 'takon to;provent tho spread of contagion and other- dreaded diseases,; l(o -thought that ; ;,the;Govemmeht\:might' in its'wisdom tako similar steps fin respect to the prevention of tho spread or indecent literature; A department which had control of such matters had been./ostablishod: in .tho United States. The. word, "censorship" was an ugly ono, and : -ono that naturally - provoked ■; feelings "of levolti rand '.whilst ho 'had on, several occasions .'referred to tho .clean press of New' Zealand, and whilst hb was-a supporter of tho liberty '.of tho .preßSr : :;ho;' thought\.tb»fc. most peoplo kne.v tho, difference helween tho freedom of ythe : press, and shameless: licenso. Hiq lord- ; ship also suggested' that there . should bo .. authorities in oaoh ? municipalitywho -. would . have powor ■to suppress hooka of the charao. ter indicated.,. - Bishop. Julius Baid that, some'timo ago he :had' been ■ personally asked to prosccuto in respect -. to certain' books . which ho' had .. examined. . 'He .had.. neverreadanything y more filthy,or. mora «alculatod :to.domorali3o . young readers..-.After.considering tho mat-4^:™-,decided?;thatrit:!vbuldibe!;iinpossibla tor him to take action, firstl. because it would :; make..tho matter' very public, and would, es-pecially-if the .prosocution failed, ndvortiio , .tho .books. . Tho, prosecution had been taken n P h y tho polico and had failed, and tho rosult had been a great demand for tho books. .! Personally ho much objected l to censorship of ■ - r"e Dross..,.Thoro -wero -.certain ■ newspapers' vpubhshsd: in .tbo 'Dominion #at .ivero utferiy xUsgraooml, Great :good ivould bo dono if , facility; woro. given for. tho suppression' of the : -,c»Ms_^f, and; newspapers referred .; did- not advocate any: puritanical suppression of literature. : c N. Adams said tho books-which , tormed the basis. of the, prosecution- in this - city woro beyond expression the filthiest con- ;- ceivablo. Sinccfthe prosecution'thoso' - books & Dtnng oponly sold in tho Dominion; » -"•; Salter,, president of tho i -iii.vJ.A.j said that ,- that 'association : was anxious to have .tho literature of the Dominion purified. Mr. S. c. Owen, headmaster of East - L'bnstohurch^Sohool) .said that schoolmasters - touny that . the' elder children had no diffi:ulty in obtaining the class of books referred■v 'Oj.and they. had 4 to, institute-a censorship, and had-to do a. groat deal of confiscation, r-fms brpnght .theih- in'oohflict with parents,.: who presented their notion.' i! He sue■'gestod that 'V.there;' should'-bo a' list '• of ■ pro- . the -employment ,of-: a - reader,by . tho IGovernment, ho conld be very glad if there was somo censorship. ; Sir Joseph Ward said the" matter would •: receive;tlie fullest consideration of:tho' Government, whioh reoogniwd tho importance of . tho. prevention of-tho ? dissemination of-the clasgps ot litoraturo referred to. Tho difficulty was to establish a system tho machinery of which would not bo regarded as an interference with the liberty of the press. :'lho difficulty-of - censorship ; was; so great that he would not go into it at all. The Government had had representations on tho subject .- parts/T-and: the representations -'of' the deputation^w OT Id bo'added to-thorn-and R-onld receive .careful Rn d fall consideration."

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090513.2.9

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 506, 13 May 1909, Page 4

Word Count
576

IMMORAL LITERATURE. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 506, 13 May 1909, Page 4

IMMORAL LITERATURE. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 506, 13 May 1909, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert