COURT OF APPEAL.
;VfcVyS? -■: / : i ; :H :'/ //./ ; // -£" 1 '■ ii >>' /" i*.'. /- •■- ■ - /,---.- 4'l LIABILITY FOB CHARITABLE AID WP~WJ-■ j''■y.?'/-fr//f;/ tv'•• ; 'i DISPUTE BETWEEN TWO BOARDS .\Yhon.the/sittings 'of;tho Court of Appeal .. ;^i;e.Z;::resumbil/Zyestdrdnyj7/argume ;■ hc|rd in regard: to tho case .between • tlio j :Vp^(irag^3toffi^North , :Hospital; and Charitable vAidV/.Board■'■.(appellants'):;'' versus/ thri /Hawera !:aiirl'Jpfc'aritable. Aid ■ Bbarcl (respond- : :?■ (with him Mr. C. A.' : ■ libiighnan), appeared on behalf. of.tho ap- , .Myers .for .the* respondents, r'yi'his 1 ■p'as- an appeal'. from' ii decision ; given. /byrMr.A. D.' Thomson.S.M.Y at Palmerstou J'-;JSortii.Xlt/'appeared'that'//a, >' mat-. liaised • lM6try .v-.with /:his/-wife and; :■ family,- resided fori more than six' /months/continuously,. .in ■ '/iiiq, /Hawera/board'sdistrict.'/; -//Ho.,ws th'cii ■. ;;6rdered^by: his, ; ni<^ical 1 advisor.;to go to a; ■ ■'/rnbrO ;silitablo district/ ;■ Accordingly) /.'.ion. ?' April 10, '.11)07, he/left Elth'am for.ltongotba,. / where lie stoved'-'for somo/days.:/ On; May 6 . he\itobk a. li'chso, at I'Vildingifor- |iirns'blf and famiiy. The cost incurred by the Palmefston Nojtli Board .in. respcct; to Merry. and., his . ' wife aiid children); from May . 6,'1907, to/May ; . 31',;. 1908, was,- in 'all; £69/ 15s. Cd. This /amount relief; at' 1 .: hospital • "to(Margaret.'Merry, 'from.-April 1003, to May 21, .1903, . A. claim was niado on- the Hawera Board by. the Paimerstoii North .Board for-', this, and it was decided by''tho Hawera Board to pay-the ac- : ./ count for. \ as;, from Slay - 6, 1907 ; the?:;l'aime'rstbn vNorili''/Board ■■ insisted' ' upon payment of .tho'. full amount, tiltiJiagis- . // trate's"Court atlmerstW; Nbrtlr, on July ' Mi;/-1908.;:; 1 Mr;. ; Tlibnisqn;•. ;S:M;i'!.gaVe;:'judgr; ; i merit-./ for/ 1 the' Hawefa;f,Boar3, : , with 'costs'on' '. j;tho,'grounds (.(I)" Thatfeutdbor ; relief , did/'not como .withinxthe.-provisions .of 74 - . Act, .1835, and (2) that tlio j indoor ■' relief ' claimed could' not bo. recovered.' under, tho . .section on' account'of the'interval of time . intervening '..between tbo .departure, ofJterry . ' imel'.'his.'.adioissioii into' the ' Paimerston ; : Frqm/itliat. r/decisiqu .appeal ;'Wa:; l . . ppennig' tho caso.for tho.' appellant, board; !V|' tiiat-t-lio: ;'- : ;qnestioiia' : ; i which'. arose were-' as . undor: ,(1) ./ Whether . £1 Section :74'!was /.'confined ''to 'relief / afforded: in. ///imr/institutionj directly:;/so,:/caUed;'/ i.e.p/an . hospital,:,' 'refuge, or.'home —or did it: ■■■ ■ extern/to outdoor/Teliefj'whether. afforded by" tho board or. by those/controlling a separate institution?'and (2) was.Merr}' resident in /Eltham six months-'next -before the receipt or. relief'or charitable'aid? ..■ .; .. : Vi:;s'Mr;JJust-ice!,t : Williams'"''hGli "that / if' the ■i Paimerston' North Board. could -ehargo. .. the . Hawera Board with tho 'cost of; tho'.mainv liis;r f amliyiv/i-b" y/olild; -//^lyi;/j^:;/by.;virtue:/bf::Sectib 7.4 of the-Hos< "-:pitals'fana:\Gharita,blo:Jnßtitutib 1885. : :[It j that;th& Palmer-V?-"Btqia i^prfch'rEjbard''!shbuld;-'sKow;-elpaTlyj'i i \ipbn\ .^■9/Hawera;\Bqard// ; was,;: ; liabler:^ -'. "institution" was 'ukid in moro .than .one / Miise.in.the. Act-./ It. was used as meaning . hospital, or : asylum, or homo xf 'some kind ■..in' whicli persons' w'erb received; it' was also . used as. meaning a-body, of persons who administered chaxitablo' aid in some form or another. In "in .- .Takirig : the . words of'. tho" ecction,'doU-n as . .far-as'the proviso, it'was clear that the institution could.not be the board, but. meant / an. institution under tho control of; tho . board.. In the present case tlioro was. no //institutionsubordinate v.to i; t/h'e,'/.lkiar(l /yrhose/. ■j.functions - tho' board -hadvtaken' over. f 'Tho nionoy for -outdoor relief :paid to tho-Mcrrys ' was money paid to them by. tho • board .V it-/ ; /i/eelf >in the,:coursb ; iperformahce : of /.the/ functions which tho Act attributed to it. If : onoj .to,tho pioviso,-his. view,.(that. ...tha* word should bo : usedm its narrower senso) becamo more clear.. The words "onteied tho hospital" wore only apt to cover . the case of a man going into a hospital or asylum, or, at any rato, applying for:-assist-' ' . ancerto such an 'institution, so that, 'lie — might bo said to havo entered it. • It might: ; bo. that an outdoor patient might be/said . to: —havG,:ontered - a/./liospital.: /•■/Where' however '/■ Vtho ,;li'a.d''s'imply/.received-gen-. - . eral outdoor:charitable- relief i (not -"from an :/j;/infititutiohr:bf-';:'UiG - ;.kihd ( '/lie/'had mentioned,' /.hut from the general funds), tlio/words .did . f .not ..seem, to. him::to cover, such, a case: .It ' fxxinied to/him tliati: so 1 far as the outdoor relief: was concerned, the Hawora- Board was vriirt iliabloi*Vas "•■■t-ho J section'": 3id j nofc-'-form of. relief. - The only other question was •. * whether the Paimerston North Board was ' entitled xo recover.-'for - the relief given/:to Merry':^whilst ; lie .wis , in /the/hospital. / v Mer'ry •. entered tho hospital on-May 25,-. but .he hqd ; become a bona-lido resident in tho Palmers- . ton North - district .'on May 6. Tho 'section required (in order that- the ■:■■■• Paimerston •North■ Board nugiit recover for his keep in ' the hospitaOvthat/Merry niiist -haye resided : ih : /,tho''Hawera;':district ;at :least :six months ; /, ; noxt; hefore^^/ho/eoitered vtho/^hbspital. • / "Next -¥ .hoforo','. in his opinion meant immediately before, That had; been held in tlio Supremt ... Ckiurt. Ho thought;.therefore,' for.tliose, rea- . sons thafc; ; the, appeal should bo dismissed.;*' . : / Justices: Edwards,'. Cooper, and! Chapman /' came . to. the./same jconclusiou... _ ;.' ./', ; . ; , The. appeal-sva's,. dismissed .ivith' /costs or ./the tcalb as-from a distance. MEANING OF A VERDICT. CONVICTION AFFIRMED. . ■ Argument/was/then heard, ivitli .respect-tt / the'xase oi"iho King versus iindrow.Uodbaz Mr.V-Myers apjwared for tho Crown,, anc Mr. Gilioid Moo re tor the prisoner.- / This caso raised a question reserved fr ;. . Mr; Justice . Chapman lor the opinion -of thi ■.: CourtCj!qdbEizf ; was \tnea': at/i'the i.Fbbruar 1
sittings*at Paliner^n ; :jS'6rth;'Upon; aii.indict-1 merit. him .^vit&vliaviiigassaulted-! Coley 'so,: as to caiiso him W-' tual: bbaily :harm,!and. also,':'on a' • second count, -;with. common-' assault. His Honour told ,tlio, jury that it.'they r accepted generally ' the Accused's evidence, as to the origin 'of tho arid coupled 'it with .that 'of Dr. llartiii;'it would still bo open to/them' •to :conclude, that excessive ::.violcnoe -was, uted He added tliati-th'ey might "think that the serious injuries to tho ribs and cheekbone ■were tno rc3ulfc/of' '' a ';subsequeni' &truggle ) ,whilo,';. ;;i>ho ;; f i : .;iiijuries - toi 'this ■ face' were such "as-'to afford gromife for tho eon-.clusion-that tlifi aohial-asskdt was: so out of proportion; any/provocation : .as : 'to be culpabl6; i;They::fourid ;as/,follows: 'J!The jury :is: of /opinion; thatviho- accused is guilty of conimoii .assault (second count),, as \ve:havo net sufficient' ovidenco who it, struck ', the ', . first blow." Ho directed atyerdict of "guilty" to vbe'. entered ( , on •the :;seooncl postponed sentencing the adcused, ■ reserving! the ;.ql^estiqbi; : »s/jto^^rhßther l y^h'e^ii^lding" :^am6ul^ted' to'a'verdiet- . . ' • . ; V; 'On behalf -of prisoner, ii,. was urged; that the • verdict .capable of itwb meanings—ono favourable to him, ; but ;"the-'other.'.iinlavour- : able.-, If that ,wcro so"prisoner .w : as 'entitled : to the benefit of the doiibi. -... : :• Mr. Justice Williamsjtyias; of opinion that the utmost ■ that - could _be said: in ■ favour of prisoner- was that the. jury: coilsidored ithn- ; material thefjilrst'.blow.': "'Even' if ; -.the'jury: had found that the; prosecutor: had . ■ struck ,tho; first ..blow: it . would :havo'. found - :'pns&er' guilty;;; Thovbrdiict..'was" reillyV an : .expression of .opinion -jaw. tho'part of tho jury ' that it was < immaterial, :whq. struck, the first ; blow;; If ; tho, jury 'had;found':that: prisoner • had'stnick' the first blow no doubt they! would : have -found=hiiri -guilty;,on the first count. As ;it'.wai .not -proved :to. their satisfaction that prisoner had stniek. tlie Tirst .blow'they found , - him-'. guilty.. only -on ' tho.; second-'.'count; treatiijing. it as; immaterial who "struck ' the first blow.'\.:The his opinion, should be affirmed. . _ . . V - A uimilai' vicw was also taken by Justices Edwards,-Cooper, and Chapman. Acnordinalv convictionwas sustained,
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19090427.2.89.1
Bibliographic details
Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 492, 27 April 1909, Page 11
Word Count
1,125COURT OF APPEAL. Dominion, Volume 2, Issue 492, 27 April 1909, Page 11
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Dominion. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.