Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHARF LABOUR.

COMPLAINTS OF AUCKLAND. EMPLOYERS. ' THE OTHER SIDE. '.' (BT- TELEOEAFH.'-HIPECIII, CORRESPONDENT.) " Auckland, September 14. • Following upon. the allegations against Auckland wharf labourers, the "Star" now publishes a denial from the union. 'Mr. Janies Collett, secretary of the union, remarking on the statement of an employer regarding the refusal, of the men to work on Saturday'ftorning,..stated'that a number of the^ine'ii'had a'distinct objection to working for this' particular employer, in that ho had giVen preference in-employment to a certain gang of men whom lie generally. kept for. this work,' only taking on .other men when Tffsown men wore not available. The IndraSir. said, .had arrived on a Tliurs'day, ! 'and' men'had been taken off othervessels : to-put oil her. Then a request <was, forthcoming for 'otlifcr'-men to go on the Invertay,: whichJiad.almost completed-her ' discharging.; '* ' ';■ "Any maii,'"')said-Mr: i Collett, "has a natural objection Ito 'tak'ingi 'the leavings of other lumpers who ■have theiprefcrenco in work, and who' are' taken -from one 'boat; before it is completed imd~pnt->'<Ar another just arrived „so,-.as ■to get :continuous work. .Of .course, .lie,does not'think it'fair'that' an-' .other • should.'go'- on 1 to the' hew job : wliile all he can»get'iß i a job finishing up the' tfo'rloof-'tlii former."-'-" '■" • '•■■ln;regard to'th'e assertion of another" em-. : ployer-Mr.- Collett said that a member of -that firm .had- como to the shed 1 on Saturday*for; men. to" lbad 1 the vehicles. He had ' > ljeeii' employing' 'a "party of' men right from * ! the"Monday till'the Friday, but these on the' Saturday had'not-turned up. "They, very i; probabT.v Wanted' 1 to go-to football, too," said. Mx;.,.Collett, "iijld,' when "they did not .'arrive' ' the -man'.comes' down to get men for the Saturdayi.morning 'hi place of' those who had I'beoniirogularly'employed during the week." » (Mh. AV."F.'Gibb) and the ex-president (Mr. E.';E. Canhan) also ex-' ' pressed' < opinions .in corroboration .of. the. ; secretary's" statement. ',' . :Mr; ;Gibb stated that' the union had applied to '- the Harbour Board for more accommodation, -with■'the offer that,' if given the''slied,"'they w r ould undbrtake :.to k<tej):out;tls''iile'tf' Vh'6''would''not. work. '/fhe;'union' had' 'llow'ilo control' over the shed. ■There wouldj he tlioughtj be plenty of men •to .work' the vessels'if every, berth was occu•pi'e'd,~but "the men could not all "hang round" 'thei'wharves'when so.'littlo employment'was 'sopietimes''availaljle. '' 'For instance, at the • ond;bf.:this"week' the' Victoria and Wimmera Would' Tie "in. port J' .and •''not riibro than 200 men''would'be required, the general number, in employment being about 600' or 700. : Mr. 'Canhan added that in other ports the "workers li&d; commodious waiting-roonis. adei'liitnbi'r bf men; 1 ' lii .Auckland there" wore'about 1000 men on the Wharves, -while:the-shed would only hold 50 men, and that" would meau crowding. As for gamb'liiig, 'he' thought the casrd games w;ero only 'played for pennies and;matches. "One official* ■has; said;'' he concluded, "that'tlio men'want l to pick: their, jobs.' It is a fact that certain, 'ken'"follow eertaih 'classes 'of work. If 'I lave' not Secured-work' and "have a good prospect of getting'it, do you think-1 am going to work for half a-day for ss. or 7s. 6d. when rcaii see a.job wortlr 30s. ? The majority oi 'those men''wh'o'were in the she'd on.Satur-' '.day' Were.'waiting for'the-officer of the Union'• , Company to tell them off for a midnight start 'on' the; Moana,--which -would under ordinary 'circumstances have left for Sydney to-day. If. these.employers mentioned keep their own men, and; the latter don't'turn up, it stands to 'reason- that we are not going ,to finish J tlieir work'for them for half a day, and lose thf!..-,chfinqe, meanwhile of a good job." It was also., explained'that maliy men objected to'work at Is. 3d. an hour 1 in the discharge ■ of such' cargo as sulphur, superphosphates and boriedustj "such as, lias been landed. in'Aucklaud''dunng the. last two weeks. .; _

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080915.2.87

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 302, 15 September 1908, Page 9

Word Count
612

WHARF LABOUR. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 302, 15 September 1908, Page 9

WHARF LABOUR. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 302, 15 September 1908, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert