MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 244, 8 July 1908, Page 2

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

; • a .'I mi; ■ police <a$K . v '"Inerioqm; ' \ ,nt < (Before Mr. W. G.'MM tS.M.)\ v i charge sheet, was yesterday,, morning,, ■ cases. ~ ■ I." '• ° Alexander .Webster;bridges .ci|tored : a plea J of npt.guilty:to. a charge {]a'Y;#g at Wef i lington qn or. about Juuo l&ffjmniitted th£ttof a bicycle', valued at property'of Walter HI Anderson. ' ' !-"■ .mandedvuntil.July 13. Si'» James", Patterson was. coMieEgS arid firied'f 10s., in default .48 hours' iMrismiraent', .fori, insobriety, and one first : Qtt&fi&iL'jvSs' con-;', noted andjined ss;, in. default'z-Liiburs'.im-" ■ prisonmcnt?. -~-uji.'ir.-i3jr ... a; '• " .loiimv xi . 't 'ni ■ i- 'jatilii- :■ ; •: 1 (Before . Mr., W. 6.. •/] 'S~ ~ ; i/.rfT'-. J 'j ; . UNDEFENDEDi^gfeioL. -j Judgment for o plaii(tiff . 'byj' fendant ..was givqii.-.-in. tho. /ollo.wiijg; civil] cases Smith' and SonspV^jJredericlt! Jones, £3. 2s.'.6d.,;.cbsts.-ss;,;san)eAv.CHuKh Clarke, 13s. Bd., cost's 7s: j Ilugb Page H'anfy,' v. John ; Adelbert Lawsou, £2il6s~,cißjis 6s. ;l Sates and.Lees v,;.Fijank:.D. 55.- . bd., costs ss. ; Mrs.'Si Siegel Wfl-I kins, £6 16s. lid.,' cost's',±ll 3s. ..SoT'i George J Doughty and Co. v." ' William trfimcs liTOlson,) 2s. Jd., costs 175.: William '{Truest \v James Joseph Cronin, £16 16s.,.)«J&ts £1 10s. 6d.; Nellio Frances Gibson vvfPercy lurkly, £2 13s;; costs 103."'; W r Sna r^ U nv '•'feS £ nd „9°- v -' Williai' H'efe' WffiSkp'itt,: £'9 Us, Sd., costs £4 Qs- 6d. l ;'PTCa®rf'Piaiio Co. v. Michael Scaiileh,-£ll-.fls.|'.d3fe £1; 15s. 6d.; same v. iß6irß' 6d., costs £1- 3s. 6d. j-th^'Giiaf l MoM° Preserving and Freezing. Co'. : .Zelhind,. Ltd., v. Charles L.< Allen-;£s?]M ifeoosts £1 3s. 6d.; Scott'and Co. v. TP. BeetfiSh, £9 :-95.,, costs £1 6s. 6d5; Scott and>CO:%omas John Brosnan, £4 lis.' lOdvrasts TO. • E H. Crease and Son, Ltd., v. Js'MefEßr, £9 ,Bs. 9d., costs £1 3s. 6d.; SJtnuel BFown,Ltd., v, Edward Orbell, £26 I3SV, colfts £3 ,2s; Mitchrason Bros. v. "Johif 3 MiH&, Tfill Is. 7d., costs £1 10s. 6d."; .T. v. James H. Sutlierlaiid; £4 (ft.'lMS' , %ssts AOs.; same v."Alfred W. ; £l' 3s. 6d.Bernard Hall, as assign 6e sof°'Nfel,son, Moate and Co.' 1 v. Alfred W. r HaSUon 1 "' £5 10 s. 4d costs £1 3s.'6dSons v. Ellis Stannard, 19s. '2dfecdW Ss-i' David Roche Lawlor v. Isabella r ßirfpt6lf, 3 against: separate estate, cosß"ss. Lovell v. John Saunders, £3: osfAjfei&'.Y, Hugh" Murray v. Fred'' 55.; Emily Eliza Campion v. PatFftTOßneri.i possession and'-18s.', costs' lis. '" !9 ins

JUDGMENT SUMMONSES'/. HTL'C . 111 thfe judgment summons, case, tho AVellingtou Loan Co., Ltd. v.. John IVillianr OShea and Frederick Thompson, a debt of £13 12s. (d., debtors were ordaAd-no pay the amount due before July 21, in'default .fourteen days' imprisonment... .mn w f rlcs Eriticott was ofdejHßcT to pay £29" Irs..to Harold Brotni before July 21, in do- - fault one month s. orooa. :v.> ' •• 1 • . aaitixis tfibwholo of OTrffcrfT hearing -a. more-- or less technTcal. : %a:sa'" in' J which .John A. Patersbu, 'consults (Mr. loung), proceeded against EafriiH Nfew-' : man, of Marton (Mr: Hcrdman),'fjJr ; 6d., money, allegod td be due off?,'a Wlfcatt > for the: installation of 'a •'patehlrgaiJfWnt 1 supplied by plaintiff for'a -hous'e ; defendant. ■ ; ' ■ •'. cidiKn. ; Evidence for plaintiff showed MtWl'Vaa : | the holder.'of the, patent'riglits *br if*'gas 1 called.Hyc'ar ". gas, 'Used for cotpci&flmit-.j mg; etc., and he enteVod intd'aif agramenfc'j with-defendant to'plac'e the 'iifhdii:&'< which defendant had' built ne'i?" IMa|ton. }• Newman saw the light, before he^%Ml : .to ; j .have-it in his house, .and was/sitlMfq witfr-. it. Some delay took place in inp{iUife -tho",' plant 'on account of the yard notMtf&jprd.'.'« pared,? and' further, trouble' was cilised^ftei 1 ' j the plant was installed through 1 . 4 ii I jjcno'sit said to:have been left by mason'hMSflaying got into the pipes, biit neither.'of wteiS.faults;, 3 •it 'was 1 suggested, were the /result '(T'/piin- J tiff's work.'. When plaintiff ] light it; worked 'well, but . his " ) e.mjployees'could not make it work,' beqmse, 'it ';ij was.contended, they wore poor 'meclianira; and : 'i had. been'-.unable to put into .pr&Mi what J plaintiff' had-told them.' ■ : Thd a". J 'gas cspert '-wlio had , i .that the installation was satisfactory if pro- | perly managed. After part..of plaintiff's < case had _ been. heard, an adj'oufnniH)t_ivaß :: made until-this; morning: . . .-; , I