Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED MANSLAUGHTER

THE COLLISION IN DUNEDIN HARBOUR. CAPTAIN CASHMAN'S EVIDENCE. > U'kom ouu srECiAL connEsrosnriNT.! ■: ■ Dunedin, May 28. The trial of Josopli Coddoi on a chargo of manslaughter, in that- lie. negligently managed his launch in Otago Harbour 011, the " night of April 18, thus causing .tho„collision with tho Lady Roberts and the death of four personsj commenced '"to-day. . Captain Casliman, .9! tho Lady Roberts, said, in the course of his cross-examination, that there was' good water-for 600 feet in : the channel, where, the collision took place. Ho kept 200. feet of good water on his staxboard'side. Ho meant good water; for his .ship, drawing aboiit 9ft. Biri. : .Ho knew that: ,• by regulation 25 ho should keep- to tho starboard sido of tho channel. That was the rulo of iho road, -apart from regulations, when it ' was safe. In this caso he had to keep midway becaus6.it? was not a narrow channel, being buoyed only on one side. . ' Mr;.: Solomons CanVyou,'.point, to any authority which' will teach us that this rule does not apply. to such a. channel as this ? . ' "Witness replied that lie could not. Ho was keoping his pioper position in steering a mid- , ; channel . course. ,He,. steered for the light, aud, that was the. only means of, working the harbour. . ' Mr. SolompnAccording to,what you say, this;man,deliberately-went out',of his course and "ran; straight; into you. without rhymo or reason, arid without cause? :- '. ~ : Witness :.Yes.v Arid -yet you-havo sworn in tho Court bolow . that it .was an error of judgment? Yes;.:'-.'' '■'■:■ i"''' .-. ! ■ .. ; ;- Do > you consider -that an ■ error of judgment'? - . ' i : ' • I cannot '.call '.'it .-.anything el-se. ' Why? ■■".-. Becauso no man in ;lns senses would have done such a thing'. ',' . . ." •. ■ You . say ;that' the .wrongful act this man committed was to turn his boat to starboard ? \ 'Yes. • .j, ' • And that-;was; the cause of tho accident? .Yes. L -Witness, 'in answer ./ to questions, said ho:;didnot.understand, why there should havo been; an' outcry ■ about .danger - oni tho - launch, arid; : in ,consequence, ail'-altering' of her coursd. -Ho supposed that' the launch could travel sevens or. eight knots an hour. Mr. Solomon:. I suggest., to you that,. if. your story is true, the Matakana must havo ; - travelled; over.twenty miles' an hour to cross . tho.: space . between herself ' and the . Lady Roberts. When you saw,-this .vessel forty -,; yards in front, why, did. you not" twist your ■ ' vessel ,"sharp to ' by reversing 0110 engine and keeping,the other going ahead? .■■l "would have been taking chances that no sane man would take. Why?- : ' I -would' -have .been looking- for a collision then., I wouldJiate,climbed right on top of her.'.,;;'-;- 1 .";;■' ' ■ .'■ • Why ? Would not your vessel,havo turned - to starboard, and; thus keeping tho rule : of the road got out-of. the difficulty ?- L did . every thing in my power to avert tho 1 collision. ■ Have'you,not admitjted.in <the,lower-Court , that you appreciated.-that; a ohango in your course was necessary? ; 7 . If I had time to do,it. .'And do you .not, se<),.that,, if it' was necessary to turn your course from the Matakana, " the man in that boat would■ expect you, to turn from her, and that, if you had done so.sho would havo entirely escaped your vessel ? No answer. . Mr. Fraser : ; Looking" back,; is .thero .any : moral thiiig you epuld . hav'e dono ,to save the collision? ,', ' ; '~, ,-" - Witness: Nothing at- all. - ;; -Mr; Solomon: You say .that this, vessel was . about fifty yards on your right' hand sido' j.: when the man changed .his' course?'-' ' : .: Witness': .-Yes.j:.Sho' .wouldt-have passed mo ,„; by 150ft/'r£'sho.--had , ..kept'.beß'c6urg(s.y: Supposoy.you 'ihad : kept going- full speed ; ahead, ;'sho:travelling ; six knot's and you'nine,. ' there would : have been noaccident,; would there? '. J .'I would have been doing.a:criminal action.- ■ 1. Would'it not'.liave,'avoided: tho -accident? , I do-not see that it would. . Mr. Eraser:. If you had gono- full- speed ahead, how . would you now describo j-our conduct? f ... : .. .. , Witness: .! should havo deserved to bo tried for-murder. ■ v.-;; 5 • '■•••■ -.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080529.2.86

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 210, 29 May 1908, Page 9

Word Count
644

ALLEGED MANSLAUGHTER Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 210, 29 May 1908, Page 9

ALLEGED MANSLAUGHTER Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 210, 29 May 1908, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert