Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAW REPORTS.

» -i i''jo;;; SUPREME COURT. CIVIL SITTINGS. ' PIICENIX ASSURANCE. COMPANY y."' UNITED ASSURAi|p^t6M^\^V ,> ' CASE REMOVED TXTO' COFRT- OB"' " 1 APPR^e-^ Tho Civil Sittings ■ werg. resumed :on Satu]£ day, morning, His .Honour, Mr.' jMlco'CKdnt'. mail taking his seat at'lfl.'SO'o'clpbK;''''" The easQ set down foV 11 ' horfi*iii'g""^t''as"tliat?' between the, Phnmix- 'Assurance and the United Assuraricii7Compftny r for £620 and. interest, which suin„.it. ■ alleged, was duo under a;rc-insuninpo' policy." Evidence had been tendcreir'tlio' previous' day to. the effect that tlio Kiiiapoi- AVoolleii. Company, Limited, occupioU' , twp'buildings'in! Casliel Street;, Christehurch:-; ; r.>;Orips.<if-.. the - structures; which of a block, was ''attachal',"\amT tlie'btjifer" which was located at tho" elVd' pf'tlio"blockj' J was "detached," and' the^btfestio)y-'' , was''s''as to which was covered- by liio rc*-iiisuraric"o policy. ■ - rlo-,r~f ; - r Mr. M. 'Chapman, K.C. (Avith..f.him.>jWrL Morison),. appeared- on J).ekalf c of" the " jjlain-* tiffs, and Mr, ,G1 Harper,'"oP'tiriKtelifl?£liV for the defendants. At'oVTAH" When tho case was callec]„p.n) oi^ r §aturday, Mr. Chapman inti mafcecj.;th^t:"_t 11(i. paiißos had; ;agreed ;.that; tho action should be camfeS,; fo ! the' Court of Appeal, with, .liberty textiles; higher Court to .draw^SfeK^.iiif^cß^^.dt. ] fact as the. Judgc of tlie TifAijlin'stfflic'o^'flUjd;'' havo-idpheY Counsel ';tpn;V^V^?+ok>®fc- fc ' meut.. .

, His Honour adjourned. consideration, 'such fnrijicfloonkid'erriiJbli 7 fe' be romoYed into .tlio mot-ion .'.for judgment; Court as requested; tlrcr.senjice" of tho plaintiffs) and defendants) to" bo in 'attendance 'at 1 ttro'^flir-. tlier hearing by (he; ConSEJSf. jftiat®i .additional evidence Versation ..which took Jjf regard the -renewal is'j^e l qu!^gdj, l ihe l *ques£ tion- of costs, to bo. Yy*'J

IX CHAMBERS. , His Honour Mr. held\a sitting in. Chambers : v : .'.'7 A HAWKE'S • An application> for intklociitriryiinjunction, was made. by Mr. sdi&iMisS: .Gertrude Alice Moinertdffig&imti..' frasstrani Mrs.'Arini Roimelly stock on t'o. the Southern" Hawko's Bay, which ofc plaintiff. - ' '• ' : Tho affidavits- showedti-'ihafc'' question contained ' 6v«?>r l ; 8;tJ@l> *'sores'r>.l-ofc which '5000 acres' oriidait «a:ttitlei which was: being providp'dS bj?■'t'ParliaiAfintp and tho balance -imdof ; -teased gfanted;"by Natives. ; The number of stock, on thfe-'Htii.' I6CX) giv ° n aS follows: ~!feSKil 3^Poo < i|:,eattlej n 1 Counsel stated that jesm\wl special -pastures, and" ; iliiit d -i^-tlefeiidaiits' ,! stock- were hot. provcnte'cl- -from trespassing - 1 plaiutjfrs ' stock ' would' .BtSryiS'..' , W-'JiW«r,;i plaintiff's stock were ■ highly "brbd'j I 'Siid : 'if \3c-> . fondant's stock M-ere allowed 'to intermingle doteribratiou might ensue'p-■llie'N'ofHi Wn ' niarama run',- which fendants, : :'had, it (Wa's ■ :bvfe"rstocked- for'some time. -Defendftnts ; wished--td r retain their stock-for-!somo- v tiffffi us the<£ was ' practically oio ' maflftft' itf.'BSVfJrfV BjJ at tho present' time'. JlLfi uiiii.l •' His' Honour: Your titlo* „to portion of 'tho'proper\Y; : an'd'iirfegard ; fio the-balance .the ptisitiofl*fs HPf flfj' ; 6ji(! v ciii'i" .interfere- unless 'they:'Hhjft'WajgKt? to possession.'' I" think that 'yOT ; afc" entitled'•to the' drder,. arid'l- shall' grant-it" ,6u ? -tfe' usual' terms.••••;••* ww"v.-»«n- jonie-

■/C / OTHER „-Thß following j business. Was-SealCwitH~ion." I'nday:— - 7 : " . His . Honour Mr. . Jiisti.qpi SiftMitilifilfii'a; sitting in. ChambeA yester.day ;mfirning» -■ . -In ro the. Rating: Act-/; ancU-iH'!re i tliQ-prOr.-coeds of the'sale of Sections vercargill. Mr., Andersott; ( .port of. a summons to ; pay,, over >tho, moneys - tori-one.-. Mpndoza> re-" •siding at 'Invercargill. .'vJlKUWlsto aqted-ion; uphalf of- the I'nbljc' Truate&jj;\!AU';jirder mado. as jfoliows :-rr®iail'%ik'!Egan;tpri! 1#;representatives, be l.ng papers ah. DunedinijAVQllingtbrt, Clui tchurch,. Nelson,- and Invcrcorgillj jjne .a 1 vertisement : to bo . insertedi.'.iifc. Gaohi -paper' evpry month, for three,:ittonths,,-i'lf no ic sponso. within ,ono month' afteri tho'ulatoi of the last advertisement, .orde^ctrfijio-imadorias; prayed. Costs to be ofr.uioueys in tbo hands of.tho ' •

Mr. Kirk, on behalf df man, farmer, Mangamairo, i:: applied for-an injunction against:.Frank Jolm 1 Quirlr, Mangamaire, • restraining- 'deferidanf "from' 'tli- f verting tho flow- of tho'^at^s. An interim .order >vas gTantediftfefendaflif'td" allow the water to flow in its Natural cburso." , r Mr - juftiw .-.Cooper aiuap-j plication m Chaml}ers to set aside-a al 1 n ? m.a Wanganui btobio. The'. : case,, which,,is to.i bo,ihqard -'at Wanganui this ..week, hacl to' 'dd : with entry of a. lease. His. Honour-refused'. : to" strike out tho,counter-claim,---butomade-iana order that : .tho ; com ß lnjncd, df, be ,removed, each .party, fp pay; his owa-jtfsts.f llis. Honour believed it ,to r be iiiat-qrialrrtQ .the mtorests. qf ..both parties that thofr-wholsr matter at lss'uo bo iLcard.jn. tW.oiio; action. : Ho, directed that tho;counterclaim ! b : o' de'alt with as if -duly filed. • • Mr.V Young j'a'ppcared l for tho plaintiff, ; , , il( .

IN BAXCO. ,, J |

: -! -. - AN APPEAL- CASK! • His Honour Mr. Justico Cooper';on. Friday heard ■ ovidoneo and argliinent" in : °'(!h''e casb 1 ' Andrews v. The Wellington Loa:n''C6'inpaiiy;' air appeal from tho Magistrate's decision. ! ii tit , 1?- t ' on t ' lo v aWas.n tliat e. 'Vcllmgtoii .Loan Company sued D Andrews for £51 15s Sd^'tho.'amount of a dishonoured promissory'- n6feA •" -Thi'-i Jlagistrato gave judgment defendant appealed and ,a ( rejiiearing was ordered by. the Supreme Court."' ; ' - Jlr.^u n (tho' Wellington Loan 'Diinn for'the i ,Tho case'" turned upon J'th'q "\tieiAiqii' "'df 1 whothor .timo to pay had Ibdeii'; allowed 11 for the payment of ' tho pronitssoi^y'note;'! "" "K' .Mr Justice Cooper. allqWjjjl P pp^{i^iV t the ground that thero clearly vvas'a;binding agreement made which'suspended'- the i'i"ht ;0f; action 'upon'• the hilKfor' at- least; 'three days.' Tho interest was MdrgeKb]<j. quarterly' and the quarter's fell'duo three days after the it '.was actually paid. This sus'pended..i;ho .'courso of action. Ho allowed tho'appMl;''ah(l bj'dored : that judgment be'entered up in 'tlie 'Lowm'"' Court for tho defendant/Andrews." ■ (His Honour would lKilftaltatt blidVrMpoudent oosts in the Lower Court,-but ho allowed tho appellant seven , guineas, .cqstsr and witness's expenses. ~

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19080217.2.96

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 123, 17 February 1908, Page 9

Word Count
871

LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 123, 17 February 1908, Page 9

LAW REPORTS. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 123, 17 February 1908, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert