Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL.

THE GRADUATED TAX. 'FURTHER DISCUSSION. OF THE < _ ASSESSMENT BILL. I •The legislative -Council': yesterday afternoon-continued the debate on the ■. .motion for the, ; second .reading of the Land i and- 111-, come-Assessment-'Bill. -,The Hon. Georgo:Jones said the Bill '' was-the- apotheosis of ingenious *md . tortuous legislation, -but ; .itv.was--. ren- • .' dered necessary by., tho selfishness of human nature. ■ .Tho unanimous acceptance ;of the Bill: m another place constituted'/ the.'-most", absolute': qurren- - dor over mado by an Opposition m any o£( tho. British .dependencies...-' It was • ' ono ■ of.the most startling incidents, of ■ our political -history. -The Hon. H.H. Scotland had said the largo landowners ■ , had v.not. beon :an-:unmitigated curse, i Ho,(tho speaker) would bo sorry to say,; y-.i that, they :wcre a. curse at-all, but they ; had served thoir turn, and must give , ;way..tq, : tho- needs,:of. settlement.' Limitation Proposals Preferred. /. ' Ho thought the'.limitation -proposals. • ofilast year were preferable to the present Bill.. He was afraid it would.-be possible for a landowner- to oxecutoa -:^'bosgus > ."'.s»loi 'and;'.lease."tho land; from tho purchaser, paying a . rent .which, would bahnce the instalments, of,.the ■ purohaso money. The' Hon. 0. Samuel was: wrong in'saying that the ■ !Bill' would prevent a man dividing his.land: among his- eons. A .father would: be ! perfectly ; l'reo to , distribute; his land " among his: iamily ifho..did'so:ina, ' bona iidc'mannor. He hoped;:tbo Government;. would; continue) ~to .purchasa estates' und;r tho Lands ;f.or.Settlement ■ Act—(he'ar,J hear)— was tho -. most' be'neficial; settlement' scheme for the Domnion and, the settlers. With a renowable; lease, instead of the leasein7perpetuity,' .the ■ system; would, .be'.al-; >' , most;a''. I peri'ect 'on 6.' '.Th(i\Government, ' would 1 bo' enabled : ' by this,'. change • to ultima'jely|<;lear 'off ,tbe n debt incurred in' purchasing ,tho 'land., ! He cpnsidfired, ■a tliattho Bill should liaivo begun,'at a:lower point than £40.0C0 unimprbyed,value. ;Whilo hoping: thai; the Bill .would."passj-.he feared-thati it would: not'be' so. efTectivo as could bo desirfcd. ~ - ,'. - J Tho Honi : G.' J V Smith,; in'the coiirsp .of-his • add ress, said ■ that'; lie did 1 hot' v agree,, with; tho. opinions 'expressed by. the -Hon. ; Mr." Scotland, .but, he. hadnothing'but respect for ;.a.man of his advanced < years; - who was prepared ,'io stand: uj) ; and express his.' viows., fearlessly,'l -oven though:-.h0,.- stood .alone.. (Applauiii.) .The Bill, seemed to him 1 to be-a' ! taxation-measuro ,rather than , a means of bringing about the subdivision of . large estates. Ho agreed' with"the-.Hon'.' Sir.; Samuel in objecting to the power proposed to bo given to tho Commissioner of Taxes to decide as to the genuineness of a salo in cer-! . tain circumstances, but: he questioned • whether it would bo wise to como into conflict with tho other House on the . point. ' . , ; A Heavy Burden. .'■Ho was prepared to support the Bill,. but he recognised that the addi- ' tibnal taxation it imposed might press very heavily on. landowners in the event of a fall in of our products. Ho . would havo prefeiTod that . the limitation proposals of last year -■-'■ had been passed into law rather than the increase graduated land tax. . It scarcely seemed'fair ,to try to tax a mail out cf' land that he had . lawfully acquired.- Turning to the quesr

tion of, leasehold v. the hon. gontloman said that though ho, would always prefer tho freohold -for himself, yet he uelioved tho leasehold was the bettor for, the State, iind he was,opposed to soiling any! of .the iremaining Crown lands; Ho considered that'.'tlio Bill, was woll -drafted. 'A logal: friend of his in another city had. told him that ho did not think ho could get.through it. ,V.'v.: ; • A Farmer's Views. . • Tho Hon. J. Anstey,. speaking as ono who had paid land';tax, said he noticed that: Labour ' representatives seemed ■to know exactly how much a settler ought to pay in : land tax.. He deprecated the Hon. Mr. Paul'a remarks on the attitude of tho'.Farmers' Union'. . Mr.- Pjiul must know; well enough that' the Parmers'VOnion was not representative of ' the ..'farmers.'. The leaders of' tho Union did not represent.oiio. per cent., of,tbo-farmers. £he general' principles'.'of- the-J3ill had his hearty approval, though-he thought it was mah-ed by several serious, anomalies, p. -The' Hon.J;R.' Sinclair' seamed to . have, forgotten . that land--o, ™ ers had to pay all tho. ordinary taxesv'iis. Well.'as: tho land "tax. In comparing tho rovonue from land with that from tobacco, he" had' overlooked the -.' fact-: that farmers also.- used !■ to--baccb; and paid tho, tax von it. • .He (Mr . Anstoy) th ought tho, - graduated' tax was a bettor method if disintegrating : largo Estates -than-' limitation, either by value, or by:area.' The Bill could be strengthened by the provision of a ■ special, pbnalty, for: evasion. The Lands for. Settlement policy' had largely, broken down by: reason of the cost,' and, ho well land-owners t0,:;7 themsblves I lease portions of thoir' estates to suitI able settlers on approved terms: He objected to the 'jumping"- nature of i the .increased ■ graduated tax. It was ! scandalous, and. amounted to confiscai tion .of the last £1000 worth of I £4Q,000. • If -.this could not 'be altered I now, ho was .sure that y it would, be I necessary, to do so before very -long. Sundry Criticisms. ' ;:/ Tho Hon. ,R. A. Loughnan spoke in support of the Bill. :-v -.•„•••■ ■ The. Hon. H. IV Wjgram : expressed tho.. opinion! that . measures., like..the Land, and. Incomo Assessment' Bill should ho: referred by tho • House • m which, they originated to tho , Joint Statutes .Revision 'Committee.....This ■would.. enable i some : members of the Council .who were \ highly,, iqualified for .the task to .-in themi , Some of the,,,clauses,,'Of/.this Bill, which were, intonded 1 to; prevent evasion, would probably iVatish 1 more fish thanthoy wero:' meant , to. , The clause. relating to. companies, was a 'case in- point.,- • Other; clajises .'were, involved. and. difficult* to. interpret. Ho 'approved of^the,Bill and preferred it to the limitation . proposals • of. last year. > , , ' , Tho .Hon. ,W..- H. Tnckor said -he would Vote for tho Bill, but he hoped to' see ..it altered in '.somo- respectsr He did: not: understand the meaning- of• tho. won! ."evasion". ;as ,used<' in this connection., To: mako incorrect returns, so as' to cause ■ one's taxation to be less, would. in his opinion bo evasion, -but hoi could■ not ■ seo why. , should' be! ; appliod tOj the action of a.man in making 'over a portion,, of his estato. to. his son..: Ho objected to, retrospeotivo legislation, but approved of. the main principles of the The,, debate was adjourned at 4-55 p.m.- on the motion of • the Hon. -T. Ji. Macdonald,. and tho. Council then' rose. , . >■■ .■ . j

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19071012.2.44.2

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 15, 12 October 1907, Page 6

Word Count
1,072

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 15, 12 October 1907, Page 6

LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL. Dominion, Volume 1, Issue 15, 12 October 1907, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert