Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LITERARY CONTROVERSY.

I have observed that discussions in the correspondence columns of newspapers hereabouts are not always conducted in the most polite fashion, and that there is in such discussions occasionally, a considerable neglect of the suaviter in modo, whatever may be the extent therein of the fortiter in re. These discussions are usually commenced in a tolerably polite manner, but as the antagonists get their blood up, the style of writing 1 is apt to become more personal and the language less choice, I observe Messrs Bolt and

Hooper have lately been, hard at it in the pages of .the ' Witness/ on the serious subject ofthe " atonement." It has been ..frequently asserted that aj woman is always determined to havO the last word in an argument, but this weaknes does not seem to be confined to the weaker sex, and some men are resolved to have the gratification of giving the parting kick. Though the | Editor of the ' Witness ' had said the discussion must end, Mr Hooper will edge in half a dozen, more lines, and, just fancy ! as young* school ladies say, winds up by calling his , adversary a j " pig." ; What a climax., to an abstruse theologicaL controversy ! I rather like these little newspaper fights occasionally, but when either party adopts the porcine line of argument, it certainly seems high time for an editor to exercise his power of veto.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CL18760330.2.19

Bibliographic details

Clutha Leader, Volume II, Issue 90, 30 March 1876, Page 6

Word Count
233

LITERARY CONTROVERSY. Clutha Leader, Volume II, Issue 90, 30 March 1876, Page 6

LITERARY CONTROVERSY. Clutha Leader, Volume II, Issue 90, 30 March 1876, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert