Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Original Correspondence.

: ■•■ ! THE WAITEPEKA DEVIATION. (To the Editor of the Clutha Leader,) Sir, — I see from last week's Leader that the settlers in Waitepeka- and snr- , rounding districts have at last received an < answer relative to the railway deviation; < and a more unsatisfactory answer could : not well be conceived. The reason assigned by the Government for being so . long in coming to a decision on the matter ' , was that the Engineer in Chief was unable to furnish a report, on account of having to leave for the North. Now, I venture to think that the Engineer in Chief might have written his report without even. : leaving his office. He surely did not require to come to Waitapeka to discover that the line by way of Waitepeka, being one mile longer than by way of Four-milo , Creek, would increase the cost of carriage from the South by fourpence per ton ; that being a fact that the settlers never for a moment doubted Mr Carruthers in his report says that the gradients by way of Four-mile Creek are better ; but not one word about the cost of ' formation of the two lines, which is nega* ' tive evidence at least that it is not the cost of formation that stands in.the way of the : Waitepeka line being adopted. Mr i Carruthers in his report also says that the i extra fourpence per mile would be a great hardship to the settlers south of Clinton, "while it would not have any great effect upon the comparatively small traffic from Waitepeka, the lines being only two miles apart j the extra cost to the settlers in that ' district being only one shilling and sixpence ; per ton, If the Hon. Mr Richardson will only : take the trouble to look at the map he will , soon see what reliance is to be placed upon the;Engineer'B report, for he will find that : the .distance between where the . railway line' crosses the main road at the Fourmile Creek and where it would cross the road at Waitepeka is three and a half : miles, not two miles ; and' as the lowest rate of cartage in the district is one and ] sixpence per ton per mile, and that only in the summer, when there is no grain to cart, the three and a half rqiles will make a difference to the settlers of five shillings and threepence ton. From careful enquiry, I find that there are one thousand three hundred tons of grain in the district this Beason, and it is yearly increasing. . One thousand -three hundred tons at five shillings and threepence pet* ton represents a loss to-vthe district of three hundred and forty one 1 pounds'; in addition to"' which, duringthe i last year, the goods received from Dunedin , alone amounted to . over three hundred ' tons, which taken at the same rate wouldt amount to oyer, seventy pounds. Then? there are no- coals on thi* side of 'thar - Clutha, and if procurable at a cheap rater ; large quantities would be consumed; -Add! j to the above sums the cost of maintaining three and a half miles'of toad to .carry such traffic, and you- will see that hot onlytho district but the country at large .woiildvbe' benefiitted by taking the; lihe^by; r Way of - Waitepeka. At* the present" v time * the - country is. discussing the question of the .;-; abolition' 1 of the provinces ; but Ithink -, facts such as these ought to make them pause before taking such a $tep ?r /yiThen a ;-,,.;, whole community 'backed by a yqte 'oif^ihe; : , Provincial;Council,'iß denied^tsjustnghti^^^' 7 simply on account of an Engineer^ report, f.ui what may we expect' when; leftifentireLy; to d-d the" tender mercies of an imbecile^Gbvern- dy ment.-H-I am, etc., A-;-. -■;."; :y- .yyfdy'y y >: ■ ,-, . ' A, jWattepeka .SbttlerV .. " .

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CL18750708.2.32

Bibliographic details

Clutha Leader, Volume 1, Issue 52, 8 July 1875, Page 5

Word Count
625

Original Correspondence. Clutha Leader, Volume 1, Issue 52, 8 July 1875, Page 5

Original Correspondence. Clutha Leader, Volume 1, Issue 52, 8 July 1875, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert