Resident Magistrate's Court.
BALCLUTHA, July 7j 1875. (Before J. P. Maitland, Esq., 8.M, ) M'Dcnald v. Lattimer. Claim L21 15s 6d for goods supplied. Judgment was" given for the amount claimed and L2Bs costs. Cramond v Sievewright. Charge of abusive and insulting language. It appeared plaintiff went to defendents hou>e, when there, a dispute arose in connection with some , business transaction between them! plaintiff called defendent a liar, and defendent returned the compliment by calling him a blackguard. Plaintiff stated that he was very much exasperated, and should such provocation fee given him again, there would be no telling what might be the result 1 Case dismissed. In tbe case. Peat v. Wright. Chim of L 42 Is 6d. Judgment was given for.L32 8s no costs. This amount was admitted by defendent, and tendered before action, to plaintiff. R. Grigor v. Thomas Mackay of Hamp. den. Claim of L 37 5s dishonored acceptance Judgment for amount claimed together with L 3 89 costs. Maitland Bros. y. W. M'Fadden. Claim L4 l no appearance of defendent, case adjourned until; Wednesday the 14 inst.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CL18750708.2.30
Bibliographic details
Clutha Leader, Volume 1, Issue 52, 8 July 1875, Page 5
Word Count
181Resident Magistrate's Court. Clutha Leader, Volume 1, Issue 52, 8 July 1875, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in