Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Railway Diversion at Waitepeka.

♦ . —^ — ; In. our issue of the Ist ultimo we. pub- -„, lished a report of the -meeting of /a deputation with His Honor. the; Super- .- iriterident regarding the i proposed diver- .. sion of the Southern Trunk Jjhe of. railway by way of the Waitepeka Valley, instead of, as proposed by Mr. Brunton, by the Four- mile Creek. In .the ;fblr ' ; , .; lowing issue we gave copy of a. letter written by the Superintendent to, the A. Colonial Secretary upon the subject,. , and in which he strongly urged, the adoption by the Government of. -the r , views of the, deputation which had,, waited upon him. So far as we are , aware, no reply has yet. been returned ' to this letter, and the settlers of the . . district must be , excused for feeling considerable anxiety as tp the result. To them the matter is one of very great ... importance. Judging from a : personal examination, and from* the opinions of , intelligent men of business who. have been long in the disti^t, and, are tho-' •' roughly acquainted with both, routes,. .,, we think there cannot be a doubt as ; to which would afford the greatest amount . . of benefit to the largest number of in-i- . habitants, and also be likely to give the. best returns for the money .expended. In the one case — by Four-mile Creek— the line would pass chiefly through . pastoral land, and by a narrow gorge, its sides so steep as to render access to . any station which might be fixed upon almost impossible. If taken by -this-, route the traffic from the district adjoin- „ ing, the railway- for a long distance ,* would be comparatively/ nothing. Should . the Waitepeka Valley be' chosen, the. line would pass through a. thoroughly , settled district, which would contribute . largely to the traffic. Not only would tho, traffic be caught of the Warepa, Puerua* and Waiiepeka districts, but also, ;that of Poty Molyneux, Glenomaru, Catlin's River, &c, all of which would other- , . wise continue to go; as at.preseht-^by „ water. Thus, even granting; that the < ', original cost of construction^ the lino ; by the one route would slightly exceed . that of the .other, there cannot be, a doubt that the proportionate , returns would be much more satisfactory. ThoEngineer gives as his reasons for selecting the Four-mile Creek routey that the; .. one by the Waitepeka Valley would be,,, about three-quarters of a mile, ; longery ... . would entail an extra expense, in .earthworks of £12,500, and that, the gra-y dients would be much steeper. , We desire fully to defer to the opinions of a professional gentleman upon all matters. . coming within the range of his profes- *; sion, but we are bound to say that but few - men acquainted with the. different : routes, unprofessional men, no doubt, but at the same time men of common." . sense,; and of some experience in rpad making, gradients, &c,- will agree with . the Engineer in the conclusions ,at . which he has arrived. They are con-v : . vinced that the earthwork > would' ,p> j; cheaper, and the gradients .easier ;by ; •• the Waitepeka Valley . ; route, f and r -' this opinion has been fullfy'exnressed in, . the memorial upon the' i subject , ,for- ' ,' warded by the settlers of the surround^ . ; ing districts to the Minister of Public, ; Works. It is to be .hoped ;>f hat; the. ., prayer of the memorialists? will at ? { pn;c6' „ be granted, or, if not, 'that the, Govern-* ment before refusing it will, cause <a<re;«i. :) sii'Vey of the line 'to be made <by a■, •'. second engineer, and also, obtain cpn^r ; petent advice upon the questions f as.<to 5 what route Would most benefit , the diftrict, arid be. likely to pay best.-, Aa> : ', already said we wish to give ; eteryide*. , ferericeto the opinions of; professional v. men,' but no on«* can traverse the ordi- A nary roads of this ■ Province, or study <•■ the lines of railway in their relation to >A: the convenience of the inhabitants,- "and „.-; the rail Way returns, without seeing that h many serious ; blunders; have? been comr ;, J mitred— -blunders such as; but veryjfewj .;- unprofessional but practical men would < fall into. The haste; with; which) tho>:. exigencies^ of the cpuntr^ademapdefjtji';,that; such road-lines : should, beclaidtoffivlr , may form an excuse for their absurdity ?>; "mmahy cases,-but . in .the present^n**? .. g ; stance the selection iof the route, is^of ao, s ; much 'importance to the, district) and the ,, .country: 4 at large,,; thatV'.the djilleit v quiry-and. ealculatfo^^ ; : before a^ecislort!is*arrived|jafe^j jsjhquj^' this be done, we have no fear that in diie time the prayer of the memorialist^ will be granted. "" '"* ■" ':"' .'■"-..

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CL18741105.2.17

Bibliographic details

Clutha Leader, Volume I, Issue 18, 5 November 1874, Page 4

Word Count
747

Railway Diversion at Waitepeka. Clutha Leader, Volume I, Issue 18, 5 November 1874, Page 4

Railway Diversion at Waitepeka. Clutha Leader, Volume I, Issue 18, 5 November 1874, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert