Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Legality of firm’s sale not addressed —Caygill

Wellington reporter The legality of the sale of New Zealand Steel, Ltd, to Equiticorp was “not specifically addressed,” at the time the Minister of Finance, Mr Caygill, told Parliament yesterday. The Government, however, would vigorously defend itself against allegations by Equiticorp’s statutory managers over the deal, which took place between late 1987 and early 1988. The Crown is named as twelfth defendant in an action filed last month by the statutory managers. Answering questions from the Opposition Leader of the House, Mr Bill Birch, Mr Caygill said legal advice obtained at the time had concentrated on making sure the Crown was paid by the Equiticorp subsidiary, Ararimu Investments Four, Ltd.

“While the question of the legality of the transaction was not specifically addressed, it would have been subsumed in the general question of whether what was suggested would have been effective in ensuring that the Crown was paid,” said Mr Gaygill. Mr Birch asked why such inquiries had not been made, given the nature of Ararimu. Mr Caygill replied: “What the Crown did was sufficient to satisfy itself of the legality of the transaction. The proceedings which have been issued against us will be vigorously defehded.” Equiticorp’s statutory managers are alleging either that the Crown knew the deal was illegally structured or that there was negligence in not investigating the structure of the deal more thoroughly.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19891206.2.27

Bibliographic details

Press, 6 December 1989, Page 4

Word Count
233

Legality of firm’s sale not addressed—Caygill Press, 6 December 1989, Page 4

Legality of firm’s sale not addressed—Caygill Press, 6 December 1989, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert