Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Michael Lawrence

Michael Lawrence (piano) in the Great Hall, Arts Centre, October 13, at 1.10 p.m. Reviewed by Paul Goodson. Pianist Michael Lawrence is what I would term a middle spectrum performer. He is neither musically concupiscent nor locked into an interpretative chastity belt. Not every pianist should enact the musical equivalent of tearing off one’s clothes and dancing naked in the rain. Dependability, a firm but undemonstrative technique and good judgment may sound bloodless, neutral qualities to bring to the perfonning arts. In practice this is far from so.

With Lawrence one is assured of performances of integrity. He is an excellent Brahms pianist and a good Beethoven one. The contrasts between the lyrical and the expansive in the three Brahms Intermezzos were •done with subtlety and insight. Following Op. 118 No. 1 by No. 2 rightly showed the unitary nature of the composer’s conception: intensity and strength giving way to serenity and poise. The E flat Rhapsody has a

Schumannesque majesty, and was delivered both with control and with the right degree of underlying restlessness. Beethoven’s “Waldstein” sonata is a difficult nut to crack. Some arbitrary pedalling in all movements and a very quick opening Allegro sometimes blurred textures, especially in the stormy development section and in semiquaver coruscations. But unflagging keyboard energy and well judged contrasts in tempo kept momentum going. To my ears the concentrated Introduzione was too rhapsodic; a tendency throughout the sonata to lift the hands too high in cantabile passages compromised melodic smoothness and flow. With a “purer,” more defined finger legato, the need for sostenuto pedalling would also diminish.

The deceptively untroubled sounding Rondo was elegant and measured. The glittering Prestissimo — which almost seems to mock the lovely opening theme by doubling the tempo — brought the sonata to a suitably unabashed close. • ’ •>

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19891014.2.46.2

Bibliographic details

Press, 14 October 1989, Page 6

Word Count
300

Michael Lawrence Press, 14 October 1989, Page 6

Michael Lawrence Press, 14 October 1989, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert