Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Telecom profit

Sir, —Telecom’s profit has leaped to S24OM and the Government is a big beneficiary. With the introduction of charging local calls to business customers, we wonder at the cost of the installation of the necessary technology required; also the plan to introduce yet another billing system and the cost incorporated with that. Even with the reduction in toll and data charges, will anyone be better off except the Government? Although we have been told that residential charges will not be introduced, we feel that, yet again, it will be the elderly who will be penalised indirectly by the introduction of business local call charges. What of the many people who are resident in rest homes and longstay hospitals — the telephone is one of their only independent means of contact with their friends, families and the outside world, yet very few would be able to sustain the cost of a private telephone installation when they are in care. We constantly need to remind ourself that our telephone communication lines are no longer a public service as they were, but rather this Government’s profitmaking business. — Yours, etc., W. L. PEARCE, M. P. WOOD. July 21, 1989.

(1) Letters submitted for printing in this column must not exceed 150 words. They should be written in ink or preferably typed on one side of the paper. Ample space must be left in the margins and between lines for sub-editing marks. (2) Letters written over pen-names or initials will not ordinarily be considered for publication. A legible signature and full postal address — not a P.O. Box number — are essential. (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. The Editor does not undertake to acknowledge, hold, return or enter into correspondence on any letter not accepted for publication. (4) Address letters to the Editor. “The Press,” Private Bag. Christ church.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19890726.2.90.14

Bibliographic details

Press, 26 July 1989, Page 16

Word Count
314

Telecom profit Press, 26 July 1989, Page 16

Telecom profit Press, 26 July 1989, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert