Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Autonomy not sensible—M.P.

By

OLIVER RIDDELL

in Wellington Talk of separation and independence for the Chatham Islands has been discounted by their member of Parliament, Dr Peter Simpson.

He said he understood the concerns of the islanders that their special status be recognised and preserved.

“But the solution arrived at needs to recognise that the Chatham Islands are part of New Zealand. It is not sensible to talk about separation or independence. “Also, I believe that most Chatham Islanders don’t want that,” he said. He was referring to the anger among Chatham island leaders (“The Press,” April 11) at New Zealand’s attitude to them.

The chairman of the Chatham Island County Council, Mr Bunty Preece, had said that if New Zealand did not want them the Chathams did not want to belong to New Zealand.

“If New Zealand won’t look after us and value us then we’ll look around for someone who will,” he said.

Dr Simpson welcomed the review of the Chathams economy and constitutional status announced by the Government. “It would be ludicrous' for me to try to pre-judge the outcome of the review,” he said.

A modified relationship between New Zealand and the Chathams was desirable and the review just announced could achieve that.

The issue was a satisfactory deal for both the Chathams and New Zealand. The review was an opportunity to achieve that. It would not moulder in a drawer but should lead to practical recommendations for the changes needed on the Chathams, he said.

The present situation was not satisfactory to either partner. The review ought to be able to retain the Chathams as a valuable and valued part of New Zealand. “Its remoteness and smallness means that the Chathams Island group is a special case,” Dr Simpson said. “It is our only populated remote offshore island and it does have special status. “I hope it follows from the review that this special status is recognised and strengthened.”’

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19890412.2.41

Bibliographic details

Press, 12 April 1989, Page 8

Word Count
324

Autonomy not sensible—M.P. Press, 12 April 1989, Page 8

Autonomy not sensible—M.P. Press, 12 April 1989, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert