Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Tax refund from error

PA Wellington Hundreds of former public servants may get a refund in tax paid on severance or early retirement money, because their employers wrongly interpreted an Inland Revenue Department ruling.

The error’s biggest impact is expected to be on former Forest Service and State Coal Mines workers, but also affects former employees of Government departments. It could involve Stateowned enterprises whose pay clerks adopted practices in line with the State Services Commission.

The problem has arisen because of an S.S.C. interpretation of an Inland Revenue Department ruling.

The S.S.C. believes large amounts of money may be involved in individual cases, but the I.R.D. thinks they would be quite small.

Neither can say how many people are involved, nor how much the Government may have to repay in total.

The situation has come to light after a former public servant asked the I.R.D. to check deductions made by his employer.

“He thought they were wrong, and inquired why that ruling was being applied,” Mr Dennis Young, director of the I.R.D.’s technical section said. The issue concerns the inclusion of payments for long service leave and leave not taken in the taxable sums paid. Mr Young said the I.R.D. checked and found out that the S.S.C. had applied a wrong interpretation to a ruling issued for the 1987-88 tax year. “We think the old ruling was misunderstood for some reason which we were not able to track down, largely because the employing authority had no letter from us telling them how to make the calculations.”

Mr Young said the I.R.D. had no record of being asked for such guidance.

“People apply the law as they understand it, until someone finds out they are doing it wrongly,” he said.

The S.S.C.’s ruling was adopted by Government departments and used in calculating payments, particularly for those taking early retirement or voluntary severance.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19881207.2.38

Bibliographic details

Press, 7 December 1988, Page 6

Word Count
312

Tax refund from error Press, 7 December 1988, Page 6

Tax refund from error Press, 7 December 1988, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert