C.U.C. ‘bureaucracy gone mad’—developer
The Canterbury United Council is "stultifying growth” and is "bureaucracy gone mad,” says a developer whose innovative project the planning authority almost blocked.
Mr Ken Plumstead, developer of the Halswell Mill Craft Centre in Sparks Road, said that the council was being negative and trying to destroy those who tried to help Canterbury. It was “ultraconservative.” Mr Plumstead’s criticism was prompted by the five-year saga leading to planning approval for the craft centre to open later this month.
He said that if the council had been more receptive to his idea in its early
stages he could have saved three years and $50,000. "The only real thorn in the side of this development has been the United Council. They have really blocked me at every turn,” he said. "This park is going to create employment for 15 to 20 people — all brandnew jobs — and it will provide a lot of income for Canterbury.” He believed the centre’s first 12 months would realise as much as $4 million. That would increase as the centre became established. In the end, said Mr Plumstead, the council dropped its objection, but “in bad grace.” The council had acted like "the
great clobbering machine.” He said that during the period of the council’s objection to the scheme he was denied the chance to explain the proposal to councillors. The Paparua County Council gave him support and was behind the project, he said. Mr Plumstead said that the United Council should be more accommodating to bona fide developers. The system had to be changed. Although his project conflicted with the Paparua District Scheme the Paparua County Council was prepared to allow a dispensation. “The Canterbury region has a future in the tourist
and servicing industries — in fact, I believe that could be its only future,” he said. The United Council was against the centre’s focal point — a windmill — and an Incorporated rabbit farm. The centre will have other attractions, including craft exhibitions, horse-riding, and sailing boats. Mr Plumstead hoped that the council would be more receptive to plans to increase Canterbury’s popularity as a tourist destination. Otherwise, developers would take their ideas elsewhere. “Many have done so before because they have been driven out,” he said.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19871005.2.48
Bibliographic details
Press, 5 October 1987, Page 5
Word Count
374C.U.C. ‘bureaucracy gone mad’—developer Press, 5 October 1987, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.