Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Bill of Rights

Sir,—Mr Palmer accuses those who oppose his Bill of Rights of prejudice, ignorance and bigotry, and still appears to be undeterred from his resolve to impose this nasty piece of legislation on New Zealanders. He has left unanswered the question of how the bill can improve democracy, when it actually takes power from our elected representatives and gives it to a non-elected, non-accountable body. It is all left up to whether or not we have confidence in the integrity of our judges. Mr Palmer has also not explained how the Bill of Rights can protect us from infringements by the judiciary when it is that same judiciary which will interpret and apply the bill. To give power to a non-elected body to declare Acts of Parliament invalid and at the same time, allow it to set the limits on its own actions must surely be a recipe for totalitarianism. — Yours, etc. MATTHEW J. JENKINSON. February 8, 1986.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19860212.2.112.7

Bibliographic details

Press, 12 February 1986, Page 20

Word Count
160

Bill of Rights Press, 12 February 1986, Page 20

Bill of Rights Press, 12 February 1986, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert