Armoured vehicle said to be unsafe
NZPA-AP Washington Tests of the United States Army’s new personnel carrier had shown that it was more vulnerable and the soldiers inside were more likely to be killed or wounded than the service was willing to admit, said Congressional and Defence Department sources. The tests were conducted in the middle of the year in
answer to criticism of the vehicle, known as the Bradley fighting vehicle. The exact test results are classified, but they were described late last week by Congressional and Defence Department sources who said that they had seen the data. “They showed that it’s a very dangerous vehicle to be in on a battlefield, more dangerous than the Army
wants to admit. The Army is putting the best face on it,” said one. Lieutenant-General Louis Wagner told a Defence Department news conference two weeks ago that the weapon was the finest personnel carrier in the world. The dispute over the test results is the latest round in the long-running controversy over the Bradley, a
25-tonne armoured vehicle that looks like a tank and is designed to carry soldiers to the battlefront. It is armed with a 25mm cannon, a heavy machine-gun, and anti-tank missiles. The Bradley went into production in 1981 and more than 2000 have been delivered at a cost of about ?U51.56 ■ million ($3.09 million) each. The Army is believed to want to buy 6832
of them. Criticisms of the Bradley have centered on contentions that it would burn too easily, because its armour was made of aluminium. The latest tests may provide new fuel for Congressional critics who want to cut the programme, particularly because Congress is constricted by new legislation requiring spending cuts to balance the Budget..
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19851224.2.75
Bibliographic details
Press, 24 December 1985, Page 6
Word Count
290Armoured vehicle said to be unsafe Press, 24 December 1985, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.