Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

S.I. power price ‘already fair’

By

OLIVER RIDDELL

in Wellington

The South Eland power differential is close to the fairest value that can be justified at present, says the Minister of Energy, Mr Tizard. He told the annual conference of the Electrical Supply Authorities’ Association at New Plymouth that he was afraid that many South Island interests would have great difficulty in accepting that.

Electricity pricing between the North and South Islands had been the subject of discussion for some time.

A 10 per cent differential now favoured the South Island, but many South Island interests had been pressing for a much bigger difference, Mr Tizard said. Arguments advanced to justify an increase included a view that the generating stations belonged to the South Island, that much electricity landlocked in the South Island could not be transferred North, that be-

cause it was colder in the South Island electricity prices should be lower, and that lowering the price of electricity helped regional development.

Generating stations had been financed in common by all electricity consumers as part of an integrated national network. Power from South Island hydro stations was not markedly different in cost from that from new thermal stations in the North Island.

Mr Tizard said he was aware that a national power generation plan avoided the South Island having surplus electricity. Also, to vary the price of electricity away from its costs was a most expensive form of regional development. The transmission system between the two islands represented the difference in the cost of supply. That cost would not justify a differential of much more than 10 per cent, Mr Tizard said. In spite of Mr Tizard’s statement, the committee of South Island Government members of Parliament plans to continue to lobby him on the 10 per cent differential. Mr Jim Anderton (Lab., Sydenham) said Mr Tizard’s comments had not closed off all the options. He declined to say what the South Island members had put to Mr Tizard, but he did say he was still hopeful of a positive outcome on the detailed submissions made.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19850920.2.15

Bibliographic details

Press, 20 September 1985, Page 2

Word Count
347

S.I. power price ‘already fair’ Press, 20 September 1985, Page 2

S.I. power price ‘already fair’ Press, 20 September 1985, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert