Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Reporter challenges India’s stern law

NYT New Delhi India’s Supreme Court has agreed to hear a motion by an reporter challenging the validity of a sweeping antiterrorist law and stern press censorship rules in Punjab.

Brahma Chellaney, is wanted by the Punjab state government for a report on the purported killing of Sikhs by Indian soldiers in June during the raid on the Golden Temple in Amritsar. The challenge widened the scope of the news agency’s confrontation with the government. From a case concerned with the safety of an employee, it has now developed into one that questions the restric-

tions on individual liberty and press freedom in Punjab.

The case also raises the level of the debate to the nation’s highest judicial chamber. A five-member constitution bench, led by Justice, Yeshwant Vishnu, Chandrachud, scheduled a second hearing for next Tuesday. Chandrachud said the reporter would remain free on bail until the next hearing. Extending bail would also be examined at that court session.

Earlier, the same panel agreed to hear a similar petition by the former Maharajah of Patiala, Amrinder Singh, challenging

the constitutional validity of what is called the TerroristAffected Areas Act and the censorship rules.

The act sets up special courts to deal with terrorist suspects; the censorship orders, later relaxed in most parts of Punjab, banned the publication and transmission of any reports, editorials, cartoons and even advertisements that could spark sectarian fighting between Hindus and Sikhs.

Chellaney, aged 27, an Indian national, has been charged with falsely reporting on certain aspects of the army’s assault on the Golden Temple and illegally

transmitting the news out of Punjab, thus inflaming religious antagonism, although the report was not published in India.

The case against Chellaney stemmed from a report in June about the temple raid that said as many as 1,200 people were killed in the action and that several Sikhs had been found shot dead with their hands tied behind their backs.

The government has denounced the report as false. The Associated Press stands by the report.

Earlier in October, Chellaney was freed on bail after he voluntarily surrendered before a magistrate.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19841102.2.112

Bibliographic details

Press, 2 November 1984, Page 21

Word Count
356

Reporter challenges India’s stern law Press, 2 November 1984, Page 21

Reporter challenges India’s stern law Press, 2 November 1984, Page 21

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert