Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Cycling on the footpath

Sir,—The debate on whether children under 12 years of age should be allowed to cycle on footpaths appears to be futile, as many cyclists, both young and old, are already engaged in this dangerous practice. Footpaths traditionally are for pedestrians, and if cyclists are in danger on the roads lack of any road sense would appear to be the cause. Perhaps our educationists should make this part of their curriculum for the benefit of all. — Yours, etc., JACK McGUIGAN. October 19, 1984.

Sir,—Because our footpaths are under-used and most car-drivers have no apparent desire to keep left, preferring instead to stick to the middle of the road, would it not be far safer for everyone involved if a continuous white line was painted

approximately 2 metres out from the kerb on all roads, to the left of which all cyclists could be kept (Cranford Street’s “rural stretch” would be a good example). Then cars could be allowed to be halfparked on footpaths. There would then be a far lesser hazard to pedestrians and children would be able to use the roads in comparitive safety. Cars are parked on footpaths in France. — Yours, etc., ■ COLIN HOUSTON. October 20, 1984.

Sir,—Just when I believed that some sanity was again entering everyday life some idiot comes up with an idea of allowing children to ride bicycles on the footpath. Can it really be true that the thought is the brain child of the Ministry of Transport? Or is it a ruse in cooperation with the Department of Social Welfare for the non-lowering of national superannuation — just get rid of the superannuitants by fright of injury. It only means the transfer of acccidehts from the roadway to the footpath, and will involve a far greater number of people. However, it will save insurance companies having to pay out for car involvement. I can see no merit in the idea, but I can see a host of difficulties, not the least being the child’s false sense of security on the footpath. — Yours, etc., A. S. HELM. October 19, 1984.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19841022.2.97.1

Bibliographic details

Press, 22 October 1984, Page 12

Word Count
348

Cycling on the footpath Press, 22 October 1984, Page 12

Cycling on the footpath Press, 22 October 1984, Page 12

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert