Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Expressway

Sir,—We have received a notice in our letter box saying the Avonside Drive - Woodham Road expressway could still be built. The folly of such a plan should be evident to all concerned. The massive cost to the ratepayer to bring more noise, pollution, and congestion to the inner city, coupled with desecration of one of the finest stretches of the Avon River makes nonsense of plans made when the motor car was favoured over people. Where does the present City Council stand on this matter? Yours, etc., ROBERT WAGONER. July 29, 1984. [Mr J. H. Gray, the General Manager and Town Clerk of Christchurch, replies: “I am not aware of any notices which have been circulated concerning the Avonside Drive-Woodham Road expressway. Certainly there has been no official communication to residents from the City Council. At the last review of the district planning scheme, all designations for roadworks were uplifted from Woodham Road. Woodham Road, therefore, enjoys as much protection from being widened for traffic reasons as any other city street not currently affected by a road widening designation. In the case of Avonside Drive, the previous expressway 1 designation was removed and a building line substituted. This is still the subject of town planning appeals. The Canterbury United Council is reviewing the transportation section of its regional scheme and I understand this will be completed later this year. At that time the City Council will have to consider any implications which may arise in respect of its own district planning scheme, but any changes contemplated in the status of Woodham Road or Avonside Drive could only be as a result of public notification with consequent opportunities for any objections to be heard by the City Council and, if necessary, the Planning Tribunal.”]

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840814.2.125.5

Bibliographic details

Press, 14 August 1984, Page 20

Word Count
294

Expressway Press, 14 August 1984, Page 20

Expressway Press, 14 August 1984, Page 20

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert