Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Growers pressed to match dole

Inexperienced, casual staff in market gardens were being tempted to claim the unemployment benefit rather than work, the annual conference of the Vegetable and Produce Growers’ Federation was told yesterday. Canterbury delegates said that because the award wage for some workers was little higher than the dole, growers were having to compete with the benefit for labour.

Mr Max Lilley said that young workers often worked for one week and then went back on the dole when they realised what they were being paid. The red tape involved in going off the dole for casual employment and then claiming the benefit again when the work had ended also put people off working, said Mr Lilley.

The six-week stand-down people faced before being eligible for the benefit meant that casual workers had a time of no income when their jobs finished. Under the market gardeners’ award, a casual worker under 16 was paid $1.66 an hour, a person aged 16 was paid $1.94, and a worker aged 19 was paid $3.15. The figures did not take into account the $8 a week cost-of-living adjustment.

Mr Lilley proposed a remit calling on the Social Welfare Department to alter regulations on dole payments to stop them competing with award wages.

He suggested “manpower committees” be created to help place people in jobs. People on the dole could be directed to jobs, such as casual work in market gar-

dens, without having to deregister as unemployed. They would be paid award wages, then go immediately back on to the dole when the job finished. The remit was lost. Several delegates thought the answer was to reduce the level of unemployment benefit or increase award wages. An amendment to the remit calling on the Social Welfare Department to require all able-bodied people on benefits to do some form of work before they could collect the benefit was also lost. Some delegates said they were ashamed to be associated with an industry that had allowed its award wages to drop almost to the level of the dole. They said the wages should be increased.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840620.2.64

Bibliographic details

Press, 20 June 1984, Page 9

Word Count
353

Growers pressed to match dole Press, 20 June 1984, Page 9

Growers pressed to match dole Press, 20 June 1984, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert