Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Tax charges defended

Judge Paterson yesterday reserved his decision after a District Court hearing of seven charges of failing to account for P.A.Y.E. tax deductions, against a Christchurch real estate business and its governing director. The Inland Revenue Dejartment (Mr A. M. Mclnosh) alleged that between October, 1982, and April, 1983, DeVere and Clothier Real Estate, Ltd, and thereby Bernard Nicholas DeVere, failed to account for deductions totalling $11,221.44. The charges were denied. Counsel for the defendants, Miss K. G. Feltham, said confusion arose when two cheques written to

cover the September, 1982, tax deductions were endorsed “present again” by the bank.

Mr DeVere told the court that each time this happened the bank manager was away, but there were sufficient funds in his account to cover the cheques.

When he discovered what had happened he paid the department with a bank cheque and assured that the two earlier cheques would be presented. If this had been done all his tax-deduc-tion payments would have been up to date, but this was never done.

The problem was compounded whan he did not realise that future payments

he made were paid against the total arrears, and not just the monthly payment due.

Further, when he investiaged his company’s tax-de-duction payments, he realised that tax was being paid on commission in the month it was confirmed, but not necessarily in the month it was paid. He said all the arrears had now been paid. Miss Feltham submitted that there was no evidence of the necessary guilty intent, and the whole problem was caused by elements beyond Mr DeVere’s control. The Judge will give his decision on Monday.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840324.2.37.3

Bibliographic details

Press, 24 March 1984, Page 4

Word Count
274

Tax charges defended Press, 24 March 1984, Page 4

Tax charges defended Press, 24 March 1984, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert