Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Chemical dump hearing delayed

PA New Plymouth The hearing of an application by Ivan WatkinsDow, Ltd, for a water right for its chemical dump at Omata has been adjourned until March 15. A Taranaki Catchment Commission tribunal will discuss then with the company conditions to the right if it is granted and make a recommendation to the commission.

New Plymouth-based I.W.D. is seeking a two-year water right to discharge dump waste into ground-

water and collect up to 1000 litres of groundwater a day. In his closing submission to the tribunal on Tuesday evening, Mr John Laurenson, for the company, said it had been shown that seepages from the dump did not constitute a hazard to public health or the environment. The poison dioxin was quite properly of public concern and although there was evidence of it underneath the dump, its concentration was no greater than that in chemicals made during 1975 and 1976.

Earlier, the commission’s manager, Mr John Douglas, said the dump should be relocated as soon as possible although a specific alternative site and proposal had not been assessed yet. A long dump life at Omata would involve high maintenance costs and the dump would have to be relocated when erosion encroached on the site, he said.

Mr Douglas urged that the present dump be granted a water right for

two years because relocation could take up to two years. The commission’s senior water conservator, Dr Michael Patrick, said a decision could not be made on a long-term solution for the dump based on evidence to date. In the interim, immediate formulation of a contingency plan for unforeseen occurrences, such as massive cliff slumping and the appearance of dioxin in uncontained seepages, was essential, he said.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840126.2.46

Bibliographic details

Press, 26 January 1984, Page 6

Word Count
289

Chemical dump hearing delayed Press, 26 January 1984, Page 6

Chemical dump hearing delayed Press, 26 January 1984, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert