‘Welcome’ sign in dispute
The “.Welcome to Waimairi County’’ sign near Christchurch should re*main and be updated, the Waimairi District Council’s finance, and by-laws committee'agreed last evening. Some councillors felt the sign on Memorial Avenue was unnecessary.- - and that one put up by the combined local authorities of Christchurch welcoming visitors to the city would be more appropriate. However, after some discussion, the committee recommended updating the sign,' and' putting ; oh. it the new; council logo.’ Waimairi ceased to be; a, county ’last year, and is now a, district: Cr Margaret Murray said she felt' the'AWaimairi' sign was superfluous. ‘
Cr P. M. Carter said he often wondered why the sign was there. Before money was spent, the council should consider whether to remove it. he said. The committee chairman. Cr ML P. Hobby, said that in the past it was considered correct to welcome people to Waimairi.
Cr R. W. Skjellerup said the 'sign' was good public relations. As an independent district, in the Christchurch •pietropoli tan, area...Waimairi should, 'continue ‘to 1 show . where it was. and the sign • ‘ was ah. appropriate means of : using; thaU ;- ■ / , ■ ’ It-might: be more sensible to combine with other local I _. authorities for - a “Welcome i - to' Christchurch"sign; he’ said.
Cr .Skjellerup said other overseas “cities within cities” used signs to indicate where ■ they were, and Waimairi should continue with its sign. /■ Cr Murray said the local authorities were, all part of metropolitan Christchurch. People came to Christchurch to look round, not to be concerned with the formalities of the local government structure. Cr W. T. Rice, who had moved removal of the sign, withdrew the proposal. He moved instead that the matter go back to the informa- . tlon sub-committee to look at the whole concept. This was then put and lost. Desert Road Improvements could not
be made to the Desert Road, near Waimairi Beach, without tremendous expense and fencing, said the district engineer. Mr A. J. W. Lamb. The land was not the council’s responsibility, he said.. . He was answering a query from Cr Chisholm about the road, where a young woman f died last week when the beach-buggy in which she was a back-seat passenger rolled over near the end of Aston Street., Mr Lamb said the council did not own the land. The Desert Road had a long history and had been a problem area. It had been used particularly for dumping. The area’could not be shut, off as an access was needed in case of fires. It was not a new- problem and an answer had not yet been found.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830208.2.43
Bibliographic details
Press, 8 February 1983, Page 6
Word Count
430‘Welcome’ sign in dispute Press, 8 February 1983, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.