Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Drug possession counts

A man in whose car two plastic rubbish bags containing a total of 1.85 kg of cannabis plant was found was convicted of charges of possession of the drug for sale or supply, and permitting his car to be used for the commission of an offence against the Misuse of Drugs Act The defendant, Craig Reginald Hamilton, aged 21, a kitchen hand (Mr R. A. Campbell) denied these offences and charges of theft of the cannabis or alternatively receiving the drug, knowing it to have been stolen. Judge Bisphan dismissed the ■ theft and receiving charges at the completion of the prosecution case. He remanded, the defendant on bail to June 24 for sentence on the other two. charges.

Sergeant W. J. McCormick prosecuted. Evidence in the case was that police stopped a car being driven by the defendant. with three passengers, at 1 a.m. on November 26. A bulky rubbish bag containing plants was found under the front seat, and a. similar bag in the car boot. The defendant said that the material was for personal use, but made no comments to questions about possession of it and its source. The defendant gave -evidence that he drove the others to the address of parents of one of’them, who wanted to get some money to go to a hamburger bar. After calling there this passenger asked him to drive to a friend's place and the defend-

ant stopped where told to, while two passengers went away. They returned later from a house, carrying the rubbish bags.. He did not know what they contained, and did not ask. The Judge said the defendant’s story was implausible. He said that implicit in the defendant’s comment to police that the material was for personal use was that he knew what was in the bags. The defendant’s car was being used to transport the drug, and there was sufficient evidence to establish that he had control or custody over the cannabis. The amount of cannabis involved was very substan-' tial, and the defendant had not discharged the onus, on him to dispel the presumption that it was for sale or supply to others.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820611.2.51.5

Bibliographic details

Press, 11 June 1982, Page 5

Word Count
361

Drug possession counts Press, 11 June 1982, Page 5

Drug possession counts Press, 11 June 1982, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert