Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Vetting versus doctoring

The curious distinction in the usage of the verbs “to vet” and “to doctor,” referred to on this page on January 16, has still not been solved. A reader. John Storey, reports that the 1933 supplement to the 12-volume “Oxford English Dictionary” records the first use of “vet,” as a verb, by Rudyard Kipling in 1904. Kipling used it in the sense of subjecting something to careful test or examination, the meaning it has retained. The form “vetting" is noticed by the supplement to the “Big Oxford" as having first been used in 1918. That- still leaves unanswered the puzzle of why “vetting” should be a respectable, even valuable activity, while “doctoring,” in a figurative sense, carries the sense of mischievous interference or misrepresentation.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820206.2.96.8

Bibliographic details

Press, 6 February 1982, Page 15

Word Count
127

Vetting versus doctoring Press, 6 February 1982, Page 15

Vetting versus doctoring Press, 6 February 1982, Page 15

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert