Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Infant swimming

Sir,—H. E. Fyfe and Chris May appear to have missed the point of my letter in which I did not criticise teaching small children to swim. I objected to the practice of forcing “babes in arms” under and through water in public pools on the pretext that this will instil confidence at a later date. However automatic their limb movements are and however carefully designed the procedure is, it is still cruel — we certainly live in a mad world. I presume that after half an hour in the pool the baby is stripped of its wet clothing and showered off, or do the mothers do this in the bath on their return home i.e., to remove chlorine and bugs? Are instructors qualified to analyse the effect of such treatment on young babies? The daily bath is sufficient introduction to this element.—Yours, etc., G. J. PROCTER. November 2, 1981.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19811103.2.108.8

Bibliographic details

Press, 3 November 1981, Page 16

Word Count
150

Infant swimming Press, 3 November 1981, Page 16

Infant swimming Press, 3 November 1981, Page 16

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert